• agent_nycto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I dislike words with the nasal E sound, specifically meal. I don’t know what but for the last three years I can’t stand the word meal. “Oh I hope you had a good MEEEEEEEeeeeal”

  • idunnololz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    biweekly, bimonthly, etc.

    Wtf does it mean? Twice a week? Every two weeks? Who knows. What’s the point of this word when it’s so ambiguous.

    • Hugin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Twice a time period. Semi for every two time periods. So every two weeks is semiweekely. However it gets misused so often you almost always have to check making it almost useless.

      Similar to failsafe vs redundant.

      • bluejuh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Frustratingly enough, it’s the other way around. Biweekly is every two weeks, semi weekly is two times a week.

        I remember it like this:

        • bicycles are two circles, biweekly is two weeks
        • semicircles are half a circle, semiweekly is half a week

        But yes, people use the words interchangeably so often that it’s faster just to avoid the problem altogether and just say “every two weeks”.

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      In the UK we have the word “fortnight” for two weeks, which helps. I also found out very recently that “biannual” mean twice a year and “biennial” means every other year so, yeah, fuck knows.

  • Geodad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    4 days ago

    When people call sex “breeding”.

    It sounds like some puritanical shit where they believe that sex is only for procreation.

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Why?

          I can point out a whole collection of really creepy kinks. This is just a word that is normally used for when two animals produce offspring, so let’s use it for people shagging, makes it more animalistic.

          I really don’t see the problem with this one but if you want real kina to blink twenty times, look into vore or guro

        • Crackhappy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’ve known a few people who used “breeding” as a kink word and I’m like motherfuckers i raised four kids it’s not a fucking kink, it’s a lifelong occupation.

    • richieadler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I only use “breeding” to refer disparagingly to the actions of those who believe that having kids is mandatory or, at least, unavoidable.

    • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I uh… I’m not sure what your source is, but for mine ‘breeding’ is anything but “only for procreation”

      E: in case it isn’t painfully obvious, I am le gay, so that may factor into your source woes :p

    • The House of Olivier EU@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      It is, maybe, something very particular as I am not familiar with that term used through “Puritanical thingy”. Sorry, I am located in Europe and lack of knowledge about Puritans 😬 [ANSWER RECEIVED]

      • Geodad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        [ANSWER RECEIVED]

        Did you look them up? That’s basically what most of the mainstream US churches are based off of.

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I like woody sort of words. Bound, prudy, recidivist. Erogenous zone, loose woman… concubine! Errrogenous zooooone!

    Funny thing, dear. All the naughty words sound woody.

    E: It appears I have misread the question. But I’ll leave my Monty Python reference here.

  • xep@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    Can’t pick just one so here’re a couple.

    “Crypto” used in the context of cryptocurrrencies. “AI”, referring only to LLMs. “Research”, referring to an indeterminate amount of reading up on the topic at hand, such as in the phrase “do your own research” that’s being bandied around in some communities.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      “AI”, referring only to LLMs.

      Yeah, it’s annoying because there are a lot of legit image recognition and pattern matching applications in my work field, and I need to ask for clarification every time someone says “AI”.

      Like, is this actually useful, or do you mean “we asked ChatGPT to generate you 20% nonsense”?

  • WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    Slay because my 10 year uses it for everything. Slayalicious, slaytastic, slayme…

    Nag. Just sounds harsh

    Bungalow. Should be obvious.

    People who shorten food names aren’t doing English any favors…

    'za (Pizza), taters, sgetti, nanners, gnosh (im hungry I need some gnosh gnosh)

    • f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Phonetically, 'za should be short for lasagne, and 'sa for pizza… or people can just say the damn words.

      Whatever, I guess. Peeps gon’ slang slang, for real, for real. 🤦‍♂️

  • carbonari_sandwich@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’ve come to hate “Utilize.” It has a decent purpose as “using to the fullest extent,” or, “making do with something in a new context.”

    Instead, I just hear it as a replacement for “use” when someone wants to sound smart.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s unfortunate - I like the concept of people talking about bundles of sticks, or slang for cigarettes. But the negative usage so dwarfs those cases that they’re really no longer legitimate

    • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      With some specific exceptions, for me. If you are one, and you aren’t using it against others, it’s fine. Like storytelling and describing a conversation, or just even being playful about it. Maybe being at a store with some friends looking at clothes or something, describing yourself and how something looks perhaps? Totally fine in my book. That’s our term, we should be able to reclaim it for ourselves.

      But someone else who I don’t know and can’t immediately determine the meaning/context that uses it? Bitch you about to die.

      • moonlight@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        I don’t know. I think reclaiming slurs can be a good thing, (queer, for example), but that one is inherently violent and I always feel uncomfortable when I hear it. Like, there’s a reason you didn’t write it out in your comment.

        • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Fair. I didn’t type it since I don’t want to be that guy like ‘you mean [word]’. It’s very context sensitive yeah, but I think it’s okay in the right moment.

    • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Off-topic:
      I’m always tempted to write it out. The word is in everybody’s mind while we read the text. It gets so powerful if people decide to talk around it. But if the context is not hurtful, it’s just a word. Nothing happens. It becomes an insult if the mind of the one who says it or the one who reads it decides to make it one.
      Plus the assholes who use it as a slur will say it anyway. We’re not achieving anything by erasing it from our bubble.
      Well, that’s what I think about it. :)