• Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    132
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Trump’s last attorney general was the son of a paedophile who was Epstein’s mentor and gave him his career start.

    A paedo Attorney General is part of Trump’s brand.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      104
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Trump himself is a pedophile. Which a lot of them know full well and just dismissed as irrelevant because it’s Trump.

      What are those phrases? Like follows like and birds of a feather flock together?

    • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      What does their father have anything to do with them? Regardless of your opinions about pedophiles, you should judge people on their own merits, not those of their family members.

  • elbucho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    1 month ago

    Oh, don’t worry. I’m sure they’ll fall in line in a couple of days and act like Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s funny you put it that way. People are saying Trump will start WWIII and I think you’re closer to the truth. He and Putin and Xi will all stay out of each other’s way and maybe occasionally fight a proxy war here and there to maintain power in perpetuity.

      Why go to war with each other when you can just leave each other alone and let everyone else do the fighting?

      Besides, Trump is beholden to Putin and Putin and Xi are buddies (Putin might even be beholden to Xi at this point considering Russia’s money issues). Who is going to go to war with who?

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 month ago

    The infighting is the point.
    The dear leader is most threatened by his closest advisors, ministers and generals.
    They are in a powerful enough position to topple him.
    So it’s crucial that they constantly fight each other.

  • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m just really hoping Trump will piss off republicans in Congress fast enough that they stop supporting him before he can cause any real harm.

    • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 month ago

      I too hope they waste the next few years with factional infighting. The senate Republicans have already gone against his personal pick for majority leader and picked a boring neocon.

  • CMLVI@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 month ago

    How long until he gets replaced and Trump releases the info to burn the bridge entirely and install an even worse person?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think it’s slightly different than what you’re suggesting. I’m thinking he’s picking the worst people he can pick for these jobs so they get denied and his next pick, which is almost as bad, gets approved instead.

      Either way, he mostly gets what he wants… and if whatever attorney general finally does get approved ends up fucking up, which they will, Trump can say, “not my fault, I nominated Gaetz.”

      • Ciderpunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think you’re assigning a level of intelligence that Trump simply doesn’t have here. He’s absolutely not planning for anything more than 10 seconds ahead. He’s got a list of people he knows will do anything he says and he’s installing them wherever with no rhyme or reason.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          1 month ago

          Sorry, I’m not trying to suggest this plan was come up with by Trump himself. It would be the people behind him.

          • elbucho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Hard disagree on this. This has Trump’s stench all over it. Every person being tapped for these positions is a Trump sycophant, and none of them are even remotely qualified to do the job he’s trying to assign them.

            I agree that Trump is not good at planning, well, anything. But none of this feels like a plan. It’s all: “I like PersonX. I will hire them.” If it feels like a very stupid, short-sighted, and childish thing, it’s because Trump is a stupid, short-sighted child.

            There is no plan for what happens if Gaetz doesn’t get confirmed, just like there was no plan informing his selection of Gaetz. If Gaetz doesn’t get confirmed, Trump will make a few all-caps posts on Truth Social, and then nominate another sycophant. He’s got so many to choose from these days.

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think that’s probably giving him too much credit. He’s not really a democratic politician, he’s a fascist.

        My bet is that he is constructing a loyalty test to weed out opposition within the ranks. Anyone who doesn’t fully give into the cult of personality gets put on a list of people he can’t trust.

        He doesn’t really care about gaetz, but gaetz has pissed off enough people within the party to act as a good tool to test the waters of his own party.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s brilliant, which means that trump isn’t thinking that. He’s picking the absolute worst people, because he always chooses the absolute worst options for any given choice. We already lived through this reality for four years.

    • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      Never, until he doesn’t obey Trump.

      Gaetz was reportedly two days away from the House Ethics Committee releasing its report on his… activities with minors - which was going to be damning. Gaetz instead quits congress to nullify their jurisdiction, and Trump gets easy blackmail over his new AG.

      Obviously having a crony run the Justice Department kills all of Trumps investigations, but it also lets him steer the department as he pleases.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 month ago

    Trump is trying to legitimize pedophilia. He doesn’t want to be the only one guilty of it in his circle

  • EndOfLine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Former President Trump said the “biggest mistake” of his presidency was picking “bad, disloyal people” to join his administration.

    (source)

    It boggles the mind that anybody would be expecting Trump to consider anything but loyalty for his appointments.

    I imagine the conversations going a bit like “You are going to be part of my cabinet. I’m told it’s not the type of cabinet you put things in, but a group of people that make decisions and handle all the boring stuff. My cabinet is going to be the best most beautiful cabinet anyone has ever seen. Here’s the hat with available positions. Let’s see what you get.”

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    These were the same people who swore in January that they wouldn’t vote if DeSantis didn’t get the nomination, and who cringed to death when Trump sold NFTs