• anamethatisnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    I definitely feel the pain when it comes to worthless results nowadays. Though in this case DDG comes through:

    Adding documentation to the search makes the “correct” page soar to the top:

    • drathvedro@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Haha, nope. The links points to a table of contents after which you are on your own. The right link should point to a specific page instead, but the problem here is that postres docs are poorly optimized for search engines. If you click on the top link from google, you would see there’s a notice that the page is outdated, with a link to a current version, but said link is dead. It’s not an issue I’ve ever experienced with mysql docs for example.

      And yes, w3schools, despite how terrible it is, is still above the official docs because it is more popular with newbies. I remember a time when I just started, I preferred sites like it, because they were simple and on point, rather than technically correct and comprehensive like the official docs are. If you forgot the feeling, try learning math on wikipedia (assuming you don’t have a math degree).

      For the rest I cannot argue. Generated/AI shit is indeed ruining the internet and search engines giving up and joining them isn’t helpful either.

      • anamethatisnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        After which ctrl+f " in" takes you to the correct chapters. I do agree that a direct link would be more helpful.
        And for learning postgresql I agree it isn’t very helpful - using their tutorial links, w3schools or something like udemy if you prefer video format is the way to go in that use case.

        I remember back when you were told to learn to work with the documentation, not memorize it, because you will always have access to it as a reference. Maybe bookmarking reference books/documentation will make a come back as the search engines degrade.

          • anamethatisnt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            " in" appears 25 times on the page to be exact, with 16 of those being in the table of contents and 9 being in the text afterwards.
            “in” appears 54 times, as you know end up hitting “string” and so on.

            Had I known that the functions table of contents was as short as it is I would probably have just scrolled.

            • ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              This is partly why I prefer Firefox’s implementation of the find feature - it allows case-sensitive search while Chrome does not support it.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Trying to learn math on Wikipedia is an endless Sisyphean nightmare just trying to understand the first word in an unfamiliar vocabulary.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      But they’re so innovative! They absolutely aren’t deserving of a massive antitrust lawsuit… /s

        • small_crow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Anti-trust is not about seeking perfection, it’s a defense against abuses of power. That’s a good thing unless you like to be abused by the powerful, in which case lick some more boots.

  • MrOxiMoron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    In desperation you click the link to the old docs, change the version to the latest version and pray you don’t get a 404

    • 🐍🩶🐢@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Been there. Done that. FML on searching for programming help some days. Versioning is a nightmare as the way you “used” to do things is no longer relevant and the rest of the results are some asshole saying it is a duplicate question that was answered 10 years ago…that is no longer fucking relevant!

      Sorry. Yesterday sucked. I hope today is less frustration and more things working like they are supposed to.

      • theparadox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        As someone who is trying to teach themselves a few new things this year by diving to projects using them… I seriously, seriously feel you. It honestly makes me question whether I should just abandon each project I start, both professional and personal.

        All the relevant hits are from years and/or 2+ versions of whatever ago or forum posts with dead links to an alleged solution.

        I feel like in the past I could just dive into something and search my way through it. Now I feel like that era is over and I question whether it’s me, my niche project idea, the disappearing community, or just the search engines.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Oh, that stuff happens all the time. The one that really pissed me off was Microsoft 404-ing basically their entire KB system.

      That thing was standing for so long you could still find Windows 9x stuff on it, and it was glorious.

      Around the time they stopped supporting windows 7, they bricked the entire thing up and started a new system. Overnight, all the Microsoft help article links went dead. Find a good forum post about an issue that you’re having and someone replied with a link to the MS KB saying little more than “this should work” followed by a sea of commenters saying thanks, that worked, but when you follow the link, it goes nowhere.

      What a fucking waste.

      • refalo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        entire KB system

        And right before they did that, they started removing footnotes from KB articles that only dealt with older OSes, so if you ever needed to go back and find something, it just wasn’t there anymore. For example certain RGB packing formats were only supported on newer OSes and the footnote used to tell you that, but then it disappeared. I have been directly affected by that multiple times.

  • OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Some of this is just because some of these frameworks and technologies have been around for a while and they iterate frequently. I see a ton of Azure content that is obsolete after only a few years.

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      For certain languages and frameworks, LLMs are horrible right now because of this. Many answers I get are a Frankenstein of different versions.

    • kamen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      There has been something similar for years: a page that basically says “Yeah, nah, we don’t have any information for that, but you might be interested in a totally irrelevant something else”, but phrased in a way that gets it high in the results. What’s astonishing is that Google doesn’t punish those pages.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Why would they punish pages that help them serve more ads? There are ads on the search, ads on the useless result, ads when you refine the query.

    • RustyNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The worse part, you enter the blog, it looks legitimate enough at a glance, go straight to the code, then find out it’s bullshit.

      We need ai blog blockers now…

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      DuckDuckGo is also being poisoned by SEO unfortunately. Some group of people managed to crack its algorithm, and as Google is slowly but fading relevancy, DuckDuckGo is now also has the same issues.