The scientists then reproduced the gut yeast in a fridge.

So they didn’t actually destroy any part of the mummy, they just used bacteria sourced from the mummy that they multiplied anyways for further study.

Of course. Being french and having experienced a football game are two good reasons to riot. Both at once.

Makes sense. Noone should build in floodable areas anyways. At least don’t rebuild after the flood has destroyed the place.

This is not about mobile phones, but about broadband and mobile bills, according to your source:

Broadband and mobile bills are soaring in the UK – depending on who you talk to

That seems quite a low sentence, even if they are underage. Are all violent crimes under that low of a punishment for underage people? If say e.g. a 15 year old stabs someone because they think it’s “gangster”, would they also just get a 26£ fine?

Right, that’s a good point

How are you allowed to drive if you have just one hand? Don’t you need both hands to steer properly? Or does she have a special steering wheel like in formula cars that rotate just 90 degrees in each direction, so that you never need to switch hands?

I had that once or twice, and for me it worked to treat it like being sick. Simply doing only the minimum for a day or two and then it went away. I assume it was somehow stress related.

But this is not medical advice, better go to a doctor instead of listening to me.

The reason why a couple doesn’t have children doesn’t affect the financial situation. Hence anyone without children over the age of 23 has to pay more no matter the reason why they don’t have children.

The point of the policy is not to punish anyone by the way, but to find money to care for the elderly. They just propose to take it from people who are at an unfair advantage right now. In Germany, having children means having less money than not having children.

Taxing the rich is something that the current German government is especially allergic to, so this policy is probably about the best we can have until the next elections.

The reason why a couple doesn’t have children doesn’t affect the financial situation. Hence anyone without children over the age of 23 has to pay more no matter the reason why they don’t have children.

The point of the policy is not to punish anyone by the way, but to find money to care for the elderly. They just propose to take it from people who are at an unfair advantage right now. In Germany, having children means having less money than not having children.

More like: “German politician proposese to make child free adults pay more for elderly care”

Are you sure they are generated, and not just added by the users posting them?

Bader Bader bastu

I don’t get why people use cars to drive onto beaches. Why not park nearby then walk a bit?

So Milka now has to pay a fine? Will it actually hurt them?

Not really. I don’t use social media that much. Except for linkedin, which is the main way of finding jobs over here. But there I just have some email subscriptions for certain job watches, so except for reading the emails and job offerings I don’t interact much with it.

So why are they called daemons and not demons?

Florida man …

Why are people on the internet so insufferable?

Our kid is three now, and the Finnish whatever children’s organisation says that no screens at that age, except for stuff like video-calling family or so. Hence, no internet as well for him.