Companies are going all-in on artificial intelligence right now, investing millions or even billions into the area while slapping the AI initialism on their products, even when doing so seems strange and pointless.

Heavy investment and increasingly powerful hardware tend to mean more expensive products. To discover if people would be willing to pay extra for hardware with AI capabilities, the question was asked on the TechPowerUp forums.

The results show that over 22,000 people, a massive 84% of the overall vote, said no, they would not pay more. More than 2,200 participants said they didn’t know, while just under 2,000 voters said yes.

  • Kraiden@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    129
    ·
    4 months ago

    someone tried to sell me a fucking AI fridge the other day. Why the fuck would I want my fridge to “learn my habits?” I don’t even like my phone “learning my habits!”

    • Zron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      4 months ago

      Why does a fridge need to know your habits?

      It has to keep the food cold all the time. The light has to come on when you open the door.

      What could it possibly be learning

      • 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        4 months ago

        Hi Zron, you seem to really enjoy eating shredded cheese at 2:00am! For your convenience, we’ve placed an order for 50lbs of shredded cheese based on your rate of consumption. Thanks!

        • variants@possumpat.io
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          4 months ago

          We also took the liberty of canceling your health insurance to help protect the shareholders from your abhorrent health expenses in the far future

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            4 months ago

            If your fridge spies after you, certain people can have better insights into healthiness of your food habits, how organized you are, how often things go bad and are thrown out, what medicine (requiring to be kept cold) do you put there and how often do you use it.

            That will then affect your insurances, your credit rating, and possibly many other ratings other people are interested in.

          • Kraiden@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 months ago

            I think you’re being sarcastic, but I unironically agree. Cars and fridges can, and should stay dumb, with the notable exception of battery management systems in electric vehicles. That’s the single acceptable use case for a car IMHO.

            • Oh I absolutely agree, some things don’t need to be “smart”.

              Imagine if someone put a microchip in a potato peeler claiming that it would add features like “sensing the amount of pressure applied to the potato to ensure clean peels”. The reason they haven’t done that is that data would only benefit the user, and they can’t think of a way to have it benefit the company’s profit margins.

            • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              I think car play is a wonderful feature. My car should absolutely allow syncing up to my phone. I don’t think it should telemetry or anything like that though. But I think internal process monitoring should also be a thing. Display error codes, show me that a tire is low, monitor a battery, etc. but the manufacturer shouldn’t get that info. My car shouldn’t know my sex life, and the manufacturer definitely shouldn’t

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago
        1. Know when you’re about to put groceries in so it makes the fridge colder so the added heat doesn’t make things go bad.
        2. Know when you don’t use it and let it get a tiny bit warmer to save a teeny bit of power. (The vast majority of power is cooling new items, not keeping things cold though.)
        3. Tell you where things are?
        4. Ummm… Maybe give you an optimized layout of how to store things?
        5. Be an attack vector on your home’s wifi
        6. Wait, no, uh,
        7. Push notifications
        8. Do you not have phones?
      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        So I can see what you like to eat, then it can tell your grocery store, then your grocery store can raise the prices on those items. That’s the point. It’s the same thing with those memberships and coupon apps. That’s the end goal.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          They can see what you like to eat by what you’re buying, LOL. No, not this.

          A fridge can give them information on how do you eat.

    • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      4 months ago

      And it would improve your life zero. That is what is absurd about LLM’s in their current iteration, they provide almost no benefit to a vast majority of people.

      All a learning model would do for a fridge is send you advertisements for whatever garbage food is on sale. Could it make recipes based on what you have? Tell it you want to slowly get healthier and have it assist with grocery selection?

      Nah, fuck you and buy stuff.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Exactly, it’s entirely about extra monetization. They all think in terms of hype and money, never in terms of life improvement.

        I’d actually love AI to control something like a home assistant setup by learning how I like things and predicting change (mind you I still need to get it set up at all). But most people don’t even want a smart home.

        Make something that makes the unpleasant parts of life easier and people will be happy with it

      • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        it doesn’t seem all that hard to make, as long as you don’t mind the severely reduced flexibility in capacity and glass bottles shattering against each other at the bottom

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Not to mention the increased expense, loudness, greater difficulty cleaning, and many more points of failure!

      • Kraiden@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        Now THIS I could get behind! Still not AI though. it’s a very dumb timer system that would be very useful. 1950’s tech could do this!

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I want AI in my fridge for sure. Grocery shopping sucks. Forgetting how old something was sucks. Letting all the cool out to crawl around to see what I have sucks.

      I want my fridge to be like the Sims, just get deliveries or pickup the order. Fill it out and get told what ingredients I have. Bonus points if you can just tell me what recipes I can cook right now, even better if I can ask for time frame.

      That would be sick!

      Still not going to give ecorp all of my data or put some half back internet of stings device on my WiFi for it. But it would be cool.

      • Kraiden@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        Ye, that’d be sick! and that’s also not what was being sold! this fridge did none of that. What exactly made it “AI” I didn’t bother to find out, but I work in IT. I guarantee it wasn’t this. Also, not convinced I want my fridge to be able to spend my money for me. I want to be able to have a Ramen month if I need/want

      • Tinks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Absolutely this. There IS a scenario in which I would love a “smart” or “AI” fridge, but it’s gotta be damn impressive to even be worth my time.

        It needs to know everything in my fridge, how long it’s been there and it’s expiration date, and I want it to build grocery lists for me based on what is low, and let me know ahead of time that I should use something up that’s going bad soon. Bonus points if it recommends some options for how to do that based on my tastes. And I want to do this without having to manually input or remove everything.

        But we’re still SO far from being able to do this reliably, let alone at any kind of acceptable price point, and yet fridge makers keep shoving out dumb fridges with a screen on them and calling them “smart”. I hate it.

        • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          A couple planets! /s

          I would be willing to never have one in my life time just to see climate change slowed to a rate nature can naturally adapt and people can afford to adjust to honestly.

          I dont forsee it being any worse then food waste and wasted grocery trips are for me.

          Computer vision, a couple services, a db, and network access can be pretty light weight. Any extra voice, natural language interface, etc is probably overkill and without special hardware (and the ecogical cost of that) not worth it on an energy use stand point.

          All speculation of course

    • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m still pissed about the fact that I can’t buy a reasonably priced TV that doesn’t have WiFi. I should never have left my old LG Plasma bolted to the wall of my previous house when I sold it. That thing had a fantastic picture and doubled as a space heater in the winter.

      • cestvrai@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Projector gang checking in 🤓📽️

        Everything alright here?

        You can always join us in the peaceful realm of select input.

        (there are still WiFi-free options)

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    …just under 2,000 voters said “yes.”

    And those people probably work in some area related to LLMs.

    It’s practically a meme at this point:

    Nobody:

    Chip makers: People want us to add AI to our chips!

    • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      4 months ago

      The even crazier part to me is some chip makers we were working with pulled out of guaranteed projects with reasonably decent revenue to chase AI instead

      We had to redesign our boards and they paid us the penalties in our contract for not delivering so they could put more of their fab time towards AI

      • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s absolutely crazy. Taking the Chicago School MBA philosophy to things as time consuming and expensive to setup as silicon production.

  • Godort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    This is one of those weird things that venture capital does sometimes.

    VC is is injecting cash into tech right now at obscene levels because they think that AI is going to be hugely profitable in the near future.

    The tech industry is happily taking that money and using it to develop what they can, but it turns out the majority of the public don’t really want the tool if it means they have to pay extra for it. Especially in its current state, where the information it spits out is far from reliable.

    • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t want it outside of heavily sandboxed and limited scope applications. I dont get why people want an agent of chaos fucking with all their files and systems they’ve cobbled together

      • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        NDA also legally prevent you from using this forced garbage too. Companies are going to get screwed over by other companies, capitalism is gonna implode hopefully

    • Tenthrow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      4 months ago

      I have to endure a meeting at my company next week to come up with ideas on how we can wedge AI into our products because the dumbass venture capitalist firm that owns our company wants it. I have been opting not to turn on video because I don’t think I can control the cringe responses on my face.

    • TipRing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Back in the 90s in college I took a Technology course, which discussed how technology has historically developed, why some things are adopted and other seemingly good ideas don’t make it.

      One of the things that is required for a technology to succeed is public acceptance. That is why AI is doomed.

      • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        AI is not doomed, LLMs or consumer AI products, might be

        In industries AI is and will be used (though probably not LLMs, still, except in a few niche use cases)

        • TipRing@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah, I mean the AI being shoveled at us by techbros. Actual ML stuff is currently and will continue to be useful for all sorts on not-sexy but vital research and production tasks. I do task automation for my job and I use things like transcription models and OCR, my company uses smart sorting using rapid image recognition and other really cool uses for computers to do things that humans are bad at. It’s things like LLMs that just aren’t there - yet. I have seen very early research on AI that is trained to actually understand language and learns by context, it’s years away, but eventually we might see AI that really can do what the current AI companies are claiming.

  • BlackLaZoR@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    There’s really no point unless you work in specific fields that benefit from AI.

    Meanwhile every large corpo tries to shove AI into every possible place they can. They’d introduce ChatGPT to your toilet seat if they could