Can you point out the part of the geneva conventions that make using incendiary weapons against military targets in non civilian areas a war crime?

Use of incendiary weapons against military targets is not a war crime unless in an area where civilians are present.

Of course they do, it’s main use is smoke generation.

Fair enough, I can see how that might be beneficial.

Ok fair enough, I see how that would be a win.

Is it really a win for LLMs if the study found no significant difference between those using it as a tutor and those not?

Audio description.

I’m sorry, but unless you exposed any US war crimes I’m not sure I can take you seriously.

What US war crimes have you exposed?

Why waste time replying just to behave like a child?

Did you even read the links you posted?

I can’t even imagine pretending to be this stupid lol