![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/db7182d9-181a-45e1-b0aa-6768f144911a.jpeg)
It was never ridiculous, people just weren’t able or willing to look into the future far enough. If someone said this would happen back in 2016 you’d be ridiculed.
And now look where we are.
she/they
It was never ridiculous, people just weren’t able or willing to look into the future far enough. If someone said this would happen back in 2016 you’d be ridiculed.
And now look where we are.
Yes I know degrowth isn’t about population, that’s what I said?
But if population naturally declines, I really don’t think it’s a good idea to try to reverse that trend. Less people means less resources consumed, and better quality of life for those children. Prioritize the people already alive over those that aren’t born. We have more than enough people in the world, and a lot of those people’s potential is not fully reached due to inequality.
Degrowth isn’t just about population, or even about it at all. Degrowth is about doing the opposite of what capitalism forces us to do, infinite growth on a finite planet.
But also, the last thing we should do is incentivize birthing more people. We have increasing amounts of automation technologies, we don’t need more people.
Of course it’s assuming that’s how advanced propulsion tech works. But it is useful to try to detect, just in case that’s how it actually turns out to work, no?
And if we detect something interesting, like a potential warp bubble collapse, well, that also gives us a strong hint that it’s possible, helping us to direct research in the right path.
Detecting techno-signatures of aliens would be super useful for us.
It can be useful in explaining concepts you’re unsure about, in regards to the reading part, but you should always verify that information.
But it has helped me understand certain concepts in the past, where I struggled with finding good explanations using a search engine.
To be fair, you need a license to drive cars
But wouldn’t the husband be at fault here either way by conservative standards? It’s infidelity.
Which makes the difference between the AIs and humans lower, likely increasing the significance of the result.
If you read into the study, they also include the pass rates for humans. It’s higher than AIs, but still less than 75%
While I agree it’s a relatively low percentage, not being sure and having people pick effectively randomly is still an interesting result.
The alternative would be for them to never say that gpt-4 is a human, not 50% of the time.
HDR is actually pretty cool, at least when you got a proper HDR display such as an OLED screen
And at the same time believe in a million conspiracy theories in fields that they definitively are not experts in
Solar panels have also been used in space mission for a very long time. The first solar powered probe was Vanguard 1 in 1958
How many times do people need to get fucked over by privatized black box software before they realize that FOSS has a point?
Because you clearly do not have any technical understanding of the field, or what machine learning even is, or how it can be useful, and the dozen of different things also called AI.
Yeah I don’t get this, I’ve known people who have posted trans porn for years on twitter lmaoo
You really need to specify what you mean by “AI”. AI has been used in tons of applications for decades. Do you mean LLMs? Because not all AI is LLMs.
Carbon taxes doesn’t make capitalism good, it’s still like, the cause of the problem in the first place
Kind of has been, not in a scientific manner, but there’s the whole phenomenon of “feral human”.
Yes, but at least European countries have more than 2 parties, making them more resilient. It also makes it easier to kick the fascists out of power after they got in.
Fascism is very much growing in Europe as well, but the situation is not as dire.