• cdzero@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hybrid. Different environments are better for different tasks. Anything collaborative I’d much rather do in person, anything requiring more than 5 minutes focus is better at home. I have a job with both elements.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’m Team Work Where You Are Best.

    Some people that means an office. Some people it means remote. The plan is the workers do the thing and get the money. A manager needing to see their ass in a chair to feel good about himself is a little creepy.

    • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I go in to the office two days a week typically - by choice - because I like the focused office vibe and I want to see my colleagues.

      I pick the days. I don’t have to announce them. If my alarm goes off and I feel like “damn I need an extra snooze” then I don’t go in. No explanation necessary.

      Before Covid it was five days a week in office. I’m very glad for the choice.

    • dingus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah I live alone and I need to see people daily in person or else I’ll go crazy. I love my coworkers.

      BUT every person and workplace is different!!! I’m the same team as you…work where you’re best. For those whose jobs are flexible in location, it seems unfair to force someone to do either one or the other.

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    4 days ago

    Home only.

    Why travel to an arbitrary location to access equipment at a different arbitrary location.

    • neidu4@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Same on both accounts, but I suspect your equipment locations are on land? Mine are one sea (ships)

      • slazer2au@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Some of mine was 30 metres up a radio tower so even if it broke we had to send qualified riggers to replace it.

  • sicarius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    Work at ‘office’ only. For sure!
    But that’s because I work with radioactive materials and I don’t want them in my home.

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 days ago

    As much as I’d love to work from home, I can’t. I’m too easily distracted and work would be at the bottom of my priority list at all times.

    I’ll happily support all of you home workers, but I can’t trust myself to do what I’m supposed to do during “work time”.

    • Carl@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think a truly WFH world would force us to fundamentally rethink some of our common infrastructure designs. And one of those would be including multiple different offices in houses. Because most houses and apartments aren’t designed with WFH in mind.

      If you have a dedicated place for work, (instead of a shared space, like a desk that you also use for your personal stuff), it helps you focus. Your brain compartmentalizes the rooms in your house, (which is why you’ll walk into a room and immediately forget what you went in there for,) so having a room that is dedicated to WFH will literally help you avoid distraction. If you try to WFH from the same desk that you play video games at, you’ll feel a constant desire to boot up a game instead of working. And inversely, if you try to play a game at your work desk, playing will begin to feel like a job. Your complaint is perfectly valid, and also so common that it would literally reshape the way our houses are designed.

    • Zeoic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      For me it’s the opposite, I’m too easily distracted so all the people talking around me while I try to work make me lose focus. At home I can sit there in peace and quiet and actually make it through a document

      • AskewLord@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Same. My productivity is awful in an office because we had an ‘open office’ and it was nothing but distractions and noise all day long. Not to mention folks coming up to you and asking you to do stuff verbally, which never got documented and therefore did not count as ‘productive’ activity.

        at home everything is an email so I have a record of things I do that looks 10x bigger than I did in the office.

        • Zeoic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah that is a good point, we also have an open office. I imagine if there were more separation with individual or team offices it would be a lot easier to work there.

          • AskewLord@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            it would, but people who design offices are buzzword lemmings who follow trends and don’t care about worker productivity objectively.

            my first office had big tall cubes and it was gloriously quiet. we are now on our third office, but since only like 20 people come in on any day, it’s much quieter than having 50-80 people, half of whom are blabbing with each other or on the phone and everyone in 30 ft of them can hear their convo.

  • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’ve been fully remote since 2018 and wouldn’t have it any other way. I can get chores and cooking done during the day, don’t waste time or money commuting, and I’m more available for both work and my family.

    People keep telling me I should “leave my house” and “interact with people” but that’s always fraught with peril and disappointment

  • ApollosArrow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    From a societal perspective I think we should be working in common spaces so we can be near people and learn to socialize. We’re losing second and third spaces. Fewer people having children also means less forced interaction and I fear we are heading towards a more isolated society.

    Unfortunately, not everyone would lives close enough to comfortably go into an office, which leaves people burning 2-3hrs of their day just doing that. And all the commuting also impacts the Earth.

    Edit: Adding that I mentioned “common spaces” and I did not mean situations where people are forced to work in toxic environments. I have been lucky to develop many friendships and also help support many relationships that have formed in the past place I worked at. The majority of the people around me were introverts, working around like minded people helped all of us.

    • zoltanshields@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      I do think the modern workplace isn’t really a good place for this either unfortunately. In my field at least it’s like everybody is a corporate mercenary. They’re going to come in, make no friends, do their jobs and then quietly leave for a higher paying position as soon as they possibly can.

      Which is fine, but it’s a pretty poor place to get social nourishment.

      • kahjtheundedicated@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah, the normal office is not the place to make friends.

        But I guess for a shared workspace for people working remote, it doesn’t really matter what they do or if they change jobs. You can make casual conversation with regulars at the water cooler or coffee bar without the weird forced interactions of working for the same company and “team building”. You’re both in this common space because you want to be there, rather than sitting at home.

        • ApollosArrow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah, that’s why I mentioned common space, since those people would want to be there. Being forced to do hybrid ends up being weird since most of those people don’t want to be there and it doesn’t really let you form bonds as much.

      • AskewLord@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Mixing your personal and professional life is a surefire way to be create an abusive and exploitative environment.

        The exploitative companies basically want to ‘foster togetherness’ so they can exploit they works via emotional manipulation techniques, and often seek to isolate workers from the outside world or life outside the office.

        • ApollosArrow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          This is very much based on the industry of course. I’ve formed life long friendships with people from my last job. I just saw one of them I haven’t worked with in 5 years and likewise a few others during halloween. I was in a position to be able to nurture those friendship and workplace dynamics.

      • ApollosArrow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I don’t think those kinds of positions would really benefit from being in office given the competitive nature.

    • AskewLord@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I don’t want to socialize with or date my co-workers. I don’t want to play politics to get promoted or have to befriend my boss or navigate office-relationships where I risk getting fired for offending or rejecting the wrong person. I also have had repeated problems with female co-workers trying to cheat on their partners with me, which I do not miss.

      For me, working from home removed that problems and got me 3 promotions in 6 years. Because what matters now is my work, and I can do it without being distracted or worrying about upsetting a co-worker who will report me for sexual harassment because I rejected their advances.

      • Herbal Gamer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Maybe thats just how offices are because I’ve never done office work but get a lot of social interaction out of my coworkers, even if I don’t meet them outside of work.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      I agree on trying to bring back some semblance of the other spaces, and I’m an introvert. But work isn’t ideal for that, not only because of potential turnover, but also the rule of thumb on bringing too much personal stuff into work that can backfire on you.

      How about more work from home where it makes sense, giving more time back that was spent commuting, and a four hour work week with equal or greater pay. Make socializing possible both in time and income given.

    • [deleted]@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      This is why I actually like my hybrid schedule which is two days in the office and three at home. 1 day per week in office would be enough most of the time, but the regular in person does help with feeling connected for a lot of people but 5 days is massive overkill.

      • ApollosArrow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        We switched to hybrid once covid died down, but the genie was out of the bottle. Most people didn’t want to come back. Since they also implemented a system where people chose what days they were in, it was hard to get proper overlaps. That company is now fully remote and have leased out their offices. As long as the hybrid is thought out, I do think it can work.

        • [deleted]@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          We all had the same days in the office so it was worth being in the office, so that was thought out. Some people don’t want to work from home and they work in the office 5 days a week which works for them. I’m just glad we have flexibility!

          • ApollosArrow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I think any company that isn’t flexible and forcing 5 days in office (for those who work on computers) is on borrowed time.

    • farmgineer@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      I can socialize outside of the workplace, thanks. Why would I want to do that with my coworkers? They’re not family and rarely ever have I befriended any and that’s fine.

      Edit: I’m all for 3rd places making a comeback, to be clear, but I neither need nor want forced socialization in an office.

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Having your coworkers be your only social interaction is a recipe for being exploited.

      Third spaces are fine but if you make me come into an office for teamwork I’m finding another job that doesn’t make me pay to commute and be away from home.

  • darthsundhaft@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    WFH because 1) it’s better for the environment 2) people I don’t want to see are at the office 3) I don’t wanna commute 1 hour one way 4) fuck getting up early 5) we call people that aren’t in the office anyway, which defeats the point of showing up, and 6) I hate my job.

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    You should have the option always. If you can work without burning fossil fuels to get to a place of work, you should.

    I’m 50/50. In my own job there are a lot of days where I am just sitting at my laptop doing drawings or inventory calculations or other menial bs. I try to work from home where I can, and it honestly is fine with me. If I do it more than 2 or 3 days in a row though I start to feel brain rot creeping in from too much sameness.

    The rest of the time I am frequently handling supplier product samples, prototype test units, taking first article measurements, and doing other shop stuff for other people in the company. I can’t really work from home in those situations but it keeps my mind active and moving.

  • gastroglizzy@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    Home only.

    Private bathroom. Private break room with full kitchen. No commute. No pants. What’s not to love?

    Plus, from the comfort of my home, behind the shield of a screen, I’m comfortable enough to say things and conduct myself in ways that are absolutely necessary to effectively do my job, but would never feel comfortable doing face-to-face.

  • zoltanshields@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    Work from home. I’ve really worked very little in an office, I find it unnecessary for collaboration and much more distracting than working from home.