ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.ee to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 22 hours agoWhat sounds like a double standard but isn't?message-squaremessage-square58fedilinkarrow-up152arrow-down15
arrow-up147arrow-down1message-squareWhat sounds like a double standard but isn't?ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.ee to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 22 hours agomessage-square58fedilink
minus-squareTedesche@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down8·17 hours agoNo, that is a double-standard, it’s just a double-standard you’re arguing is justified.
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down4·11 hours agoit would be more of a double standard if the two groups were on equal footing, but they’re not.
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·17 hours agoThe definition of a double standard is that it’s unjust. At least, in common English.
minus-squareTedesche@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·13 hours agoMmmmm…meta-injustice…(drool)
No, that is a double-standard, it’s just a double-standard you’re arguing is justified.
it would be more of a double standard if the two groups were on equal footing, but they’re not.
The definition of a double standard is that it’s unjust. At least, in common English.
Mmmmm…meta-injustice…(drool)