Privacy for the sake of privacy is a waste of …
Privacy for the sake of privacy normalizes privacy. You shouldn’t only need to be private when you have something to hide.
Privacy for the sake of privacy is a waste of …
Privacy for the sake of privacy normalizes privacy. You shouldn’t only need to be private when you have something to hide.


What’s the point of open sourcing here?
Your mum’s so fat it takes O(n!) to traverse her.
+1 for mailbox.org


Beach hoodie. They’re light and block UV
That is ridiculous.
If I want to paint apples, and you want a painting of pears, it’s not ableist for me to tell you no. It’s not ablist to iterate out your possible options for getting a pear painting either. And that’s what he’s done.
Now, the entire painting profession might be ableist in that there are certainly barriers to entry. But it’s not a single artist’s responsibility to fix painting as a whole.
My point is, if you truly think the situation with raync is ableist, help develop tools so that more people can program. Enable people to program. Don’t just shout down the guy who said “go program”. That doesn’t help.


I keep seeing this but I don’t understand. Does it not improve your privacy with respect to your ISP?


These people were brainwashed from birth. Very few people choose farming. You’re born into it and raised into it.
With that kind of upbringing, of course they’re easy to manipulate.


Please not that couch. It’s been Vanced and I haven’t had time to clean.
Republicans fear their voters
Not anymore. After the tea party shenanigans, Republicans realized it was easier to use mass media to program people on what to hate, and keep them distracted.


Accidents are caused by plenty of things that aren’t humans. I had a distant relative die from a tree falling on their car at a stop sign. The world is random and unpredictable.
This entire conversation is about the small percentage of time that AI can’t handle the situation. And you haven’t addressed that point. And neither have AI companies. And that’s why they aren’t succeeding yet.
And you can’t just say those situations don’t exist. They clearly do. And it’s not because human drivers are out there. Road hazards, shut down roads, sink holes, extreme weather, these things all exist.
I’m starting to think you don’t have much experience on the road. How long have you been driving for? Have you really never come across a unique situation that you don’t think an AI could handle? Have you never driven in a city?


Every time you get in a car you’re taking a risk. Being a good driver is about knowing which risks are acceptable to take. That’s why waymo offloads complex situations to humans.


Humans aren’t better at driving in bad situations,
Gives reasons why humans are better at driving in bad situations
Seriously?


Because this is a potential leak of information and could affect their own returns.


Yes, and that’s with 40-hour week capitalism in reality.
We’re talking about a fantasy world where increased worker productivity would lead to decreased hours. In said fantasy world. There’s no reason for the total salary to decrease just because hours worked did.


It’s about making the right choice. If you’re gonna get fucked in the ass regardless, no one is going to mock you when you pick the smaller pineapple.


Bruce is dead. Kaitlyn is a cunt


Maybe, this is getting out of hand
So you compile everything from source, yes?
Open source or not, binaries are only as trustworthy as the person compiling them and the system they’re compiled on.