• Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.eeOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      States rights as in civilian rights? Maybe my teachers just glossed over the history, but I thought it was fought because states with large slave owning populations were afraid of subtracting slavery from their economic equation.

      • WraithGear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 minutes ago

        So that’s the thing, it’s a lie of omission. The full line is ‘The civil war was fought over the states rights… to own slaves”. We were taught that north were not freeing slaves out of a moral standpoint, but to ensure monetary dominion over the south. Anyway, it’s carefully curated propaganda and white washing of history that is apparently still happening to this day.

        • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.eeOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 minutes ago

          I mean the “omission” understanding might depend on what a “right” is. An ethical right? Definitely not, as natural law makes all humans equal. Which makes the “it was fought over the states’ rights” sound like the biggest example of “but the constitution said I could do this” in history. You’d think all the people who care about rights would care as much about ordinary law to be fair.