Michigan Republicans’ clash over leadership of their state party could mean dueling presidential nominating conventions will take place March 2, even though the national Republican Party has said members properly removed former chair Kristina Karamo.

Former Congressman Pete Hoekstra, the new Michigan GOP chair as recognized by the Republican National Committee, announced Tuesday that the state Republican Party will hold a presidential nominating convention to allocate 39 of the state’s 55 presidential delegates on March 2 in Grand Rapids. But Karamo and her backers plan to hold a convention the same day in Detroit.

Meanwhile, hearings regarding the dispute over Michigan’s GOP chair position are scheduled for later this week, and a judge could resolve the situation before the convention events.

Karamo was voted out as party chair by some members in the party during a Jan. 6 meeting, but she has refused to accept the results, claiming the meeting was not official and had been illegally organized.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    10 months ago

    I predict that the Republican party will not survive if Trump loses. It will fracture and ensure Democrats stay in power for a long time.

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      If only. I’ve seen both parties come back from “permanent” defeat. But I agree - I don’t know how they’ll dig their way out of this hole. They’ve whipped their base into a froth and I honestly don’t think they are capable of governance at this point.

      • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Are you talking about the state party or federal? I ask because I can’t think of a situation for either federal party that I’d describe as a “permanent” defeat. Maybe the Whigs back in the day?

        • MagicShel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          My point is it turned out not to be permanent. Despite cries of victory or doom and gloom, things went right back to normal the next election cycle.

          Before my time, but Nixon did lasting damage to Republicans, and they eventually bounced back. So I take a lot of this sea change stuff with a big grain of salt.

          • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Nixon barely damaged the Republicans. Gerald Ford held the Presidency right after and was succeeded by Carter, a one term President. We know what happened after that.

  • LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    Weren’t they going bankrupt? I wonder where the money is coming from to hold “dueling conventions”

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Dueling convention?

    With swords? or pistols? (flintlock or we gonna go fully automatic?)

  • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    A republican refusing to accept they lost their bid for power is an absurd notion. This would never happen in real life the party of law &order would simply not stand for it.