Russia’s acts of sabotage against Western targets may eventually prompt NATO to consider invoking the alliance’s Article 5 mutual defence clause, the head of Germany’s foreign intelligence service said on Wednesday. Bundesnachrichtendienst chief Bruno Kahl said he expected Moscow to further step up its hybrid warfare.

“The extensive use of hybrid measures by Russia increases the risk that NATO will eventually consider invoking its Article 5 mutual defence clause,” he noted.

[…]

Under Article 5, if a NATO member comes under attack, the other members of the alliance are obliged to help it respond.

[…]

Kahl said Russia’s military would likely be capable of attacking NATO by the end of the decade, adding that Moscow’s war on Ukraine meant that it had battle-proven troops under its command which raised the threat emanating from its conventional forces, while it also mastered modern drone warfare.

[…]

“We don’t have any indication yet that Russia intends to go to war, but if such sentiments gain the upper hand in the government in Moscow, then the risk for a military confrontation will grow over the coming years.”

Should Russia attack one or several NATO allies, it would not do so to grab massive swathes of land, Kahl said, but rather to test red lines set by the West with the aim of defeating Western unity and NATO as a defensive alliance.

“In Russia’s view, this goal would be reached if Article 5 were to remain without effect in case of a Russian attack,” he said.

“To meet this target, you don’t need to send tank armies westwards, it is enough to dispatch little green men to the Baltics to protect allegedly threatened Russian minorities or adjust borders on Svalbard”.

  • jenesaisquoi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    Do it. The war against Ukraine needs to end, and it needs to end with a complete and utter Ukrainian victory. The only thing putler understands is violence of the powerful. Let’s help him understand he is not allowed to attack other countries. Ukraine has suffered long enough.

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        Believe who, troll? Believe what?

        Jesus fuck, does Russia even have a stated reason for invading Ukraine, besides whining about NATO? The organization that’s suddenly gained renewed support and membership because they invaded Ukraine?

        • Jack@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          I never argued that Russia has a stated reason.

          I simply argue that article 5 will not be invoked.

          Furthermore I bet that when Trump comes to power in the US parts of Ukraine will be given to Russia. I do not wish it to be so, but I think that is what is going to happen.

  • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    28 days ago

    The way things are going now Russian salami tactics seem to be very effective. They will be marching on Berlin while NATO countries still discuss if they should trigger Article 5.