• slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    The majority of technologies that power the internet were developed in the 80s and refined in the 90s. Everything since then is built as a layer of abstraction on top of those core technologies.

    • mspencer712@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Also, the development and evolution of these open technologies relies on human interest and attention, and that attention can be diminished, even starved, by free, closed offerings.

      Evil plan step 1: make a free closed alternative and make it better than everything else. Discord for chat, Facebook for forums and chat/email, etc.

      Step 2: wait a few years, or a decade or more. The world will largely forget how to use the open alternatives. Instant messengers, forums, chat services, just give them a decade to die out. Privately hosted communities, either move to Facebook, pay for commercial anti-spam support, spend massive volunteer hours, or drown in spam.

      Step 3: monetize your now-captive audience. What else are they going to use? Tools and apps from the 2000s?

      • forgotmylastusername@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        We are facing a very real possibility of the end of the web browser as we know it. Google owns the chromium engine. Mozilla is on ever more precarious footing. It’s become logistically impossible to build competing products except for tech giant. Even then everybody else gave up and went with chromium.

  • cooltrainer_frank@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Former process engineer in an aluminum factory. Aluminum foil is only shiny on one side and duller on the other for process reasons, not for any “turn this part towards baking, etc” reasons.

    It’s just easier to double it on itself and machine it to double thickness than it is to hit single thickness precision, especially given how much more tensile strength it gives it.

    Also, our QA lab did all kinds of tests on it to settle arguments. The amount of heat reflected/absorbed between the two sides is trivially small. But if you like one side better you should wrap it that way, for sure!

    • darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The amount of heat reflected/absorbed between the two sides is trivially small.

      Your particular choice of wording here makes me very curious: Do you mean that there really was a measurable difference (which was trivially small)?

      • cooltrainer_frank@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yup, the lab could tell a difference! Shiney side (so mill roller facing, as opposed to the dull side which faces the other layer of aluminum) was marginally more reflective, but I believe (and a former coworker also remembered it as) it was less than a tenth of a percent (<0.1% for the visual folks)

        Anyone who says it affects cooking time or something is mistaken, I’d wager.

        • Colonel Panic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Jokes on you.

          I baked my casserole with the shiny side up and pulled it out at 59 minutes and 55 seconds, when it was supposed to go for an hour.

          So take that Dull Side!

  • SirSamuel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    These aren’t secrets, but may not be well known (unless you watch LPL):

    Sentry Safes aren’t safes, they are fire boxes with a fancy lock.

    High security locks are not high security because of the lock design, but because the keys are very difficult to have duplicated.

    No one (except maybe intelligence agencies) breaks in to a house by picking a lock, especially in the US. Windows, weak door frames, and, in a pinch, making a hole in the wall are all faster ways of getting in.

    Car keys are so expensive because many manufacturers charge a subscription or per-use fee to access and program the keys to the ignition. These costs are passed on to consumers

    No one is picking your locks just to move things around or steal small, insignificant items. You are either suffering from a mental disorder or a trusted member of the household is gaslighting you (it’s not gaslighting though, you’re your grasp of reality is slipping. Don’t call me for a pick proof lock, just get help please)

    Some manufacturers (you know, in China) will put any sticker you want on the products they produce, including UL and ANSI stickers. Before buying a product that is supposedly fire-rated, such as a fire safe, check the UL website to verify the item is actually listed with them.

    “Grade 1” door hardware sold in stores like Lowe’s or Home Depot is, at best, Grade 2, and is likely Grade 3 (residential grade). These grades are really just about how durable the product is over time, and how much abuse they will endure by the public.

    And just a little practical advice. Find a qualified, honest locksmith before you need one. We’re like plumbers. If you wait until you have an emergency to find one, the quality will be questionable. There are a lot of scammers out there. If you don’t have a resource for locksmiths beyond Google, look on the ALOA website for members in your area. The good ones will know who the other good ones are, and won’t be shy about sharing that info if they are unavailable or too far away

    • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I learned to pick locks in my youth. I absolutely have picked my way into places and things to fuck with friends and family, but I always tell them. At some point.

      One of my favorites was getting into my friend’s garden shed and turning everything upside down, then a few weeks later rearranging everything so it was a mirror image of how it was previously.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      If there’s one thing the Lockpicking Lawyer taught me, is that the vast majority of locks only work because almost nobody bothers to learn lockpicking. Some “extra safe” locks being defeated by a fucking magnet of all things always amuse me

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Spooks (including the domestic FBI-type ones) definitely pick locks. They also have things like spray-on dust to hide the fact they’ve been in a place.

      No one is picking your locks just to move things around or steal small, insignificant items. You are either suffering from a mental disorder or a trusted member of the household is gaslighting you (it’s not gaslighting though, you’re grasp of reality is slipping. Don’t call me for a pick proof lock, just get help please)

      I have someone like this. Glad to hear it’s common-ish. She’s “getting help” but the doctors can’t do much more than we can.

      • SirSamuel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah those cases are sad. I tend to just say my prices really high, and if they persist in wanting me to come out I suddenly don’t have availability because of the “big government project” I’ve been hired to do. Even if they were worth the trouble of all the follow-up “someone broke in, you have to fix my locks” calls that inevitably come, I couldn’t in good conscience take their money.

        Last time it happened a lady wanted me to install Schlage Primus deadbolts on her house because her neighbor was “breaking in and moving things to mess with me”. I gave her a quote that was 5x higher than it should have been. I kid you not, she said, “Okay, but I’ll have to wait a couple of weeks to get the money. My husband said I couldn’t change the locks anymore and that this is all in my head.” Poor lady. I saved her number so I wouldn’t forget if she called again, but I never heard from her. Hopefully she got the help she needed, but probably she got divorced and is living on the streets.

  • miridius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Most software is a terrible pile of unreadable code with no tests and horrible architecture choices, that somehow manages to keep working just through the power of years of customers finding bugs and complaining loud enough to get them fixed.

    If you write any automated tests at all, you’re already better than most “professional” software companies. If you have a CI/CD pipeline, you’re far ahead.

  • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The world is littered with fake empty buildings used to obscure phone line junctions and internet provider stuff.

    Almost every neighbourhood has one. But they look like normal houses, so you can never tell unless you know where to look for.

    • Floon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      US universities are pro football teams with a sideline in education.

    • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I went to college before the internet was ever considered a valid source for any material. But using the internet made research extremely easy if I could determine the book source for reference.

      I went back to college right around that time the internet just became the default source for everything. It was staggering how little information was expected to be known. The implicit ubiquitous access to information was a staggering foundational shift.

  • hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    The interview is a vibe check first and foremost. If you vibe with the team we will overlook other things in your application. If you made it to interview, we already think you’re good enough so don’t stress trying to impress or apologize.

    Managers are mostly people who get tired of watching other people do things badly and decide to try to do better. You don’t need a special degree or any magic to be a good manager, you should like people though.

    Everyone is faking it to some degree.

    • elbowgrease@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      people are generally ok. put them in a situation where they can climb over other people to advance and watch the rot begin.

      so, while people are generally ok, corporate people are generally not.

    • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The „you have to like people“ part took me nearly 20 years to figure out. I hate people in general with possible remedy for people who are nice. I‘m exceptional at managing people, I just dont vibe with them. This leads to absurd situations where everyone is happy, professionally but folks just hate my guts.

      So, I now work alone and am happy with it. :)

    • Mathazzar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The navy manual for troubleshooting equipment in the field includes “lift 3-6 inches and drop”

  • Talaraine@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Most of hacking is done by mass effort with maybe a couple percent of people that aren’t doing basic things to protect themselves being affected. That couple of percent is enough to keep the hackers flush. (So please, follow basic cybersecurity steps, people.)

    The plain truth of the matter, though, is that if a hacker or group of hackers is targeting someone individually for reasons, that person is in real trouble.

    This has been a PSA for everyone chasing fame and clout.

    • kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Tips for being secure online:

      1. Use your browser’s password manager to generate random passwords.
      2. In the rare case you need to manually enter your password into a site or app be very suspicious and very careful.
      3. Never give personal information to someone who calls or emails you. If necessary look up the contact info of who called you yourself and call them back before divulging and details. Keep in mind that Caller ID and the From address of emails can be faked.
      4. Update software regularly. Security problems are regularly fixed.

      That’s really all you need. You don’t even need 2FA, it is nice extra security but if you use random passwords and don’t enter your passwords into phishing sites it is largely unnecessary.

      • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Im not so sure about your number 1. Fine if otherwise they won’t use one but personally I use bitwarden online for unimportant ones and a local keypass for important ones.

        • kevincox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          The reason I say browser password manager is two main reasons:

          1. It is absolutely critical that it checks the domain to prevent phishing.
          2. People already have a browser and are often logged into some sort of sync. It is a small step to use it.

          So yes, if you want to use a different password manager go right ahead, as long as it checks the domain before filling the password.

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s where you need people like me who give a fuck about nothing but customer experience and if my employer manages to make a buck, good for them. My employer is generally just a middle man who siphons money out of both our pockets. And makes me fill out a second, useless timesheet while you’re paying me to work.

      Jokes on me though because I’ve been out of work for 3 months, so take my suggestion of fuck your employer with a grain of salt.

    • Jack@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      That is true for outsourcing companies, but not true for product companies usually.

      • treadful@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think it’s equally true for product companies. Do you know how hard it is to get a company to prioritize bug fixing over feature work? Shy of a user revolt, or a friend of the CEO reporting an issue, bugs are almost always second priority or lower.

        • hightrix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’d say this strongly depends on the industry.

          In an entertainment or ad sales product, I’d completely agree with you.

          In a medical or financial product, the bug will take precedence.

          • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Medical? Your funny. Healthcare software is the worst. There is a reason the stuff that matters is decades old. Cause the new stuff rarely works. And the rest… tell me again why I have to fill out the same forms year after year, and they never populate with my previous answers? Or why I have to tell them my 2 year old son isn’t menstruating or hasn’t stolen a car yet (on the same form no less). The software is so hard to use the providers have given up.

  • Skanky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    A lot of the “generic” or “store brand” packaged foods are literally the same exact product as the name brands, only in different boxes/bags

    • mudmaniac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m not so sure about food, but for many mass market products it is indeed true that the same manufacturer can be engaged to make the same product under different branding. The difference then comes down to the corners cut to meet the client’s pricing. Crappier boxes, thinner bags, packing material, and quality inspection. Assuming the core ingredients are not compromised in some way.

      • trolololol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I would like that… Saving on a smaller package for chips and cereal sounds great, most of it is air anyways.

        • Breezy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          No you dont. I have worked in 2 groceries stores, the bags with less air get way more crushed and broken while stocking. Having bigger bags with a lot of air keeps the chips integrity in tact.