• atlien51@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I wonder how people have been doing it, since the beginning of time, with no help from technology.

    Ya big fucking clown.

    Edit:

    Honestly bro what is it about tech bros being the biggest fucking losers on the face of this planet? I have more respect for street sweepers at this point

    • garretble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      If street sweepers went away, people would notice within a week or two.

      If tech bros went away, we’d just enjoy not having tech bros.

      It’s like that one thing: “Who would you notice is gone first, the CEO or the janitor?”

  • nyan@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 days ago

    Given what he’s undoubtedly being paid, I’m sure hiring a nanny to look after his unfortunate offspring is well within his budget.

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    For thousands of years people have raised their kids without the benefit of the moneypit 9000, Sam Altman is apparently dumber then a caveman.

  • percent@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    Honestly, I wouldn’t be surprised if lots of new parents are asking LLMs for advice.

    And before AI (and probably still), new parents probably googled a lot of things.

    And before internet search engines, new parents probably checked out books from libraries.

    • turtlesareneat@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Parenting books were serious business, whole generations were raised with Dr Spock for instance, who had fucked up ideas about childrearing.

      It’s one thing to ask for tips on getting a baby to sleep, it’s another to ask it for formula recipes. Unfortunately I doubt most parents know the line where it becomes dangerous, but I am hoping here.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      before that it was Youtube, for certain things, which at least was somewhat helpful to niche questions.

  • shadowDingus@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    Seeing as ChatGPT was trained on other peoples’ books, articles, etc., it’s not surprising he says that.

    Kinda slimy that he probably couldn’t even give sources for his new-found child wisdom. Y’know, because ChatGPT is a glorified corporate piracy machine using stolen data and aggregating it for morons like him to read instead of doing a google search.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      The AI hate is so weird, morons because we dont want to aggregate ourselves? The dangers are huge, the costs are ridiculous, the shareprice is bubbling. Its a heap of shit but your comment is just nonsense.

      It is miles better to get aggregated information from multiple sources than read each source yourself. Consumers want convenience.

      • shadowDingus@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t believe the idea of aggregating information is bad, moreso the ability to properly vet your sources yourself.

        I don’t know what sources an AI chatbot could be pulling from. It could be a lot of sources, or it could be one source. Does it know which sources are reliable? Not really. AI has been infamous for hallucinating even with simple prompts.

        Being able to independently check where your info comes from is an important part of stopping the spread of misinfo. AI can’t do that, and, in it’s current state, I wouldn’t want it to try.

        Convenience is a rat race of cutting corners. What is convenient isn’t always what is best in the long run.

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    We have mistaken rationality for a philosophy rather than a methodology, and efficiency for a virtue without any particular end in mind.

    To have a unique, personal, subjective, divergent human experience is to sin against your prescribed algorithm.