• GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        This would have to be some burner or 2nd/3rd phone cuz there’s a lot more than worse screen or worse camera. The only A series phone i would consider using would be the A54/55/73.

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Well no shit it’s not great.

          It’s still pretty damn impressive that you can buy smartphones for that cheap at all.

          • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Honestly the sacrifices they make are pretty reasonable for every day use too. I used ultra cheap Umidigi smartphones for four years as a student and they held up quite well with a huge upside being shockingly good repairability. The biggest downside is the rear camera usually, I wish I had better photos from those times.

            You can get the Umidigi G9 5G for just $99 shipped on aliexpress. Even budget phones under $100 get 8gb RAM, 128GB storage , and 90hz displays now. There really aren’t as many sacrifices as you’d expect, and by the time you spend $200 you even get plenty respectable cameras that would be flagship quality just a few years ago.

    • ericbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      … So am I the only one that whenever I want a new phone, I just look for highest rated phone under 100 dollars? Been doing that for years, generally it’s just always just like top of the line models from 3-4 years ago.

      Been doing it for years and I’ve never really had any complaint with my phones.