• krashmo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    If Biden wanted to tax the rich why didn’t he try it when Dems controlled both chambers of Congress? I’m sure it’s more likely to happen under Biden than Trump but from where I sit it doesn’t seem likely to happen at all.

    • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because that Democratic “control” was razor thin and included people like Manchin/Sinema. We need an actual majority to pass anything without their cooperation. Even if Biden wanted 50s era tax levels on the top tax brackets (90%+), he simply doesn’t have the votes in Congress. Last time they had anything resembling a workable majority was during the Obama administration, when they passed the ACA over several months. Even then they had to water it down because of Joe Lieberman. One more vote would’ve resulted in a public option. Luckily tax policy can be done in reconciliation so a simple majority works in the Senate. Or we can elect a few more Senators willing to nuke the fillibuster, it’s pretty close now.

      Point is, it’s not just on Biden (or any POTUS). Congress (and internal Democratic party politics) are fucked. Yeah he could be doing more to get party members in line with his agenda, but they’re pretty insulated at this point. We need to capture more seats in the general while ideally primarying every moderate member of the Democratic party we can. We have to be able to cancel our the 2-3 fuckers waiting to block shit, on top of the entire other party of y’all qaeda who blocks any attempt at progress.

      Disclaimer: POTUS is now king supposedly so most of what I said could be accomplished with some strategic deportations of congressmembers and judges under official act by the border patrol or some shit.

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Last time they had anything resembling a workable majority was during the Obama administration, when they passed the ACA over several months.

        How is that W working out of the people now.

        • BassTurd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          2 months ago

          The ACA? Way better than it was before then. More people have coverage than before and pre-existing conditions can’t disqualify a person. It still needs to improve to universal healthcare, but half of the country votes for the leopards, so change is difficult and slow.

          • wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            The hospital that I worked for had a mini med plan that we paid into as that’s all our rural hospital could afford. It was a terrifying time to be alive.

        • takeda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          Are you kidding? I personally know people who were not insured before ACA and maybe would be with serious health issues now or possibly even dead.

          One I remember seeing crying, because insurance rejected her because she had situation where she had depression in the past and was suicidal. Like WTF?

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      The two “Democrats” that were giving the control weren’t really Democrats. They even changed their party. Manchin at least was not hiding who he was (he was always known as a moderate Republican), but Sinema totally cheated her voters and sold herself as soon as it was possible.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The two “Democrats” that were giving the control weren’t really Democrats.

        I’ve noticed that greater loyalty to the party is expected from the voters than from those they elect.