For all intents and purposes does. Just SCOTUS made itself as a final check on what is an official act and what isn’t.

We are dealing with an openly partisan court. Normally this wouldn’t affect it, but they already broke a lot of rules.

The ruling doesn’t even allow unrelated trials to use evidence that might be from official presidential business. Trump just requested his conviction in NY to be overburdened based on this ruling. So how it would not protect criminal acts when you can see in your own eyes this being used to get away from criminal acts. The other trials are also in jeopardy.

As for the “decision made by trials court” that is insignificant as SCOTUS can override them.

Sadly no. The way they turned it around was very clever.

So they said that only official presidential business is immune, but were ambiguous what that actually means, so inevitably they made it so it would go through them to determine what is the official business.

Second thing is that they picked up from their ass that Constitution also says that no official business can be used in any trial, even if it is unrelated. This not only jeopardizes all the indictments he had, it possibly will negate the New York trial.

trump already submitted request to have it referred based on this SCOTUS ruling.

This election might be the last free election we have. And even if trump loses it will still not be over.

Please vote and make your friends and family vote. And not just for president but also for the Congress.

Edit: I also recommend everyone a book “On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons From the Twentieth Century” (there’s also reading on YouTube) all the warning signs are present. The more people are aware what it is at stake the higher chance that this can be stopped.

It is, but the more people read it the bigger hope we have that it won’t happen.

Constitutional amendment(s) could fix things, but there needs to be enough people in Congress willing to pass it.

I highly recommend the following book: “On Tyranny: twenty lessons from the Twenty Century”

There’s also reading of it by the author on YouTube.

You vote for the person who selects the people for SCOTUS. There are two very old members (Thomas and Alito) that will likely be replaced in the next 4 years. Are you willing to let trump replace them with 40 year olds and fuck us for decades to come?

Thanks, the article was accessible for me so I thought it would be also for others.

Not really https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/01/technology/kaspersky-lab-antivirus.html

Very creative how Kaspersky used SEO to hide this story. When searching you have to exclude all of their sites to find it.

To be fair, he provided instructions.

For writing an application GPL is fine if you don’t want anyone to profit from your work and if they make changes, contribute back.

Things are a little bit more complex if you are writing a library or code that is meant to be included in another application.

If you use GPL you might get rejected even by other open source applications, as GPL might be understandable as it will change license off the application or be outright incompatible.

This was the case with cursor library after author changed license everyone stopped using it: https://github.com/GijsTimmers/cursor/commit/885156333ac9ca335a587b1dd08964074313f026

The most ironic thing is that he created package from stack overflow answer:

https://github.com/GijsTimmers/cursor/blob/master/cursor/cursor.py

The original author never said they are releasing copyright or are making it public domain.

In the first minute of the video he talks about the pool done by Echelon Insights where they actually checked the exact same people.

This one talks about it: https://youtu.be/uMVnhJEDQtg

No, that won’t do any rehabilitation. It needs to be jailed or maybe cleaning the highway.

The business records fraud case (“hush money” is misleading what it was) is just the first case that nothing blocked it from proceeding.

Documents case is blocked by Canon, J6 is blocked by SCOTUS, I guess the Georgia case could proceed too, but was maybe more complicated than this one.

Well, as you see, they prefer doing the terrorist things.

deleted by creator

The judge. The jury decides if the defendant is guilty or not and then the judge comes up with the sentence.

You know what’s crazy? We don’t allow convicted felons to vote, but with trump we are told there’s no law preventing him holding the office. Bananas.