That headline just keeps getting bleaker as it goes.

“You know the saying, ‘Human see, human do.’” - Julius, Planet of the Apes

It’s not about opposing Israel’s actions being wrong.

It’s about your personal opposition to anyone saying their actions are wrong.

Why would you think I support genocide?

Because your kneejerk reaction to my criticism of democrats’ support for genocide was to call me a trumper.

And now you’re trying to convince me to vote how I voted in an election that already happened. Because it’s evidently a bridge too far for someone to say that genocide is bad without you letting them know how wrong you think opposing genocide is.

That’s just what they mean when they say The Bold Look of Kohler.

You’re supporting clinton (because she supports the genocide you live for) and acting like a trump supporter to do it.

No. It’s why I voted for your shitty pro-genocide candidate instead of your very close second choice.

Why do centrists always pull that shit out like it means anything? Genocide is still wrong even when a democrat is supporting it. Even when it’s your single favorite thing ever, which you’ve convinced me it is.

Peak lemmy.

Here’s what a republican defending something trump said looks like:

Here’s a hypothetical example of what a denial might look like:

bluemaga acts like redmaga. Right now you’re seeing the “no, what she actually meant was” thing.

You missed the part being referenced in the headline.

No they didn’t. They deliberately ignored it because they’re doing the “no, what trump actually meant was” thing, only with clinton.

After accepting pro-genocide lies as “common ground.”

Did you forget what the claim I refuted was?

You didn’t refute a damned thing, but keep crowing about something you didn’t do. It’s the centrist way.

Is your assertion that the people who would party if the genocide runs to completion back then are the same ones seething at Hillary now for still supporting the genocide?

As was predicted. “One day, when it’s safe, when there’s no personal downside to calling a thing what it is, when it’s too late to hold anyone accountable, everyone will have always been against this.” - Omar El Akkad

It seems like you are projecting this ‘open contempt’.

You’re gaslighting. No “it seems”.

But that’s only because too many Americans are stupid and won’t vote for the obviously better candidate for … reasons.

Politicians who are interested in beating their opponents try to appeal to the electorate they have, not the electorate you prefer. And I want to make it clear, the electorate centrists prefer is comprised entirely of netanyahu clones.

“You’re taking what he’s saying out of context! That’s not what he meant!” -trump supporters.

Why should she have to play games ‘motivating’ people who could see she was significantly better than trump?

Because that’s called politics. When you actually care more about winning than about making sure progressives lose, you try to get people to vote for you instead of regarding them with open contempt.

Yes, we do.

But when people in blue states get something, they stop caring about whether anyone else has it.

Blackmail material that can be selectively used against political enemies.

All I see is the Queen of the Centrists assuming anyone who disagrees with her must be stupid or gullible instead of absolutely right.

So basically a centrist acting like every other centrist I’ve ever encountered. Dead wrong and arrogant about it.

Plenty of people on .world don’t support establishment democrats.

Let’s just put it this way: if the genocide runs to completion like the clinton wing of the party wants, .world is where the party’s gonna be.