While rebutting another post here on Lemmy, I ran into this. This says exactly what I want to say.

I am not a friend of Biden’s Administration. I think they drug their feet over a variety of things ranging from holding Trump and his goons accountable for January 6th through rulemaking on issues like OTC Birth Control and abortion rights, and yes, I think he’s too quick to please big business. But then I remember what the alternative is, and … well, disappointed in Biden or not, I’m voting for him. Because my wife is a Black bisexual goth woman, four strikes under Team Pepe’s tent. And I have my own strikes for marrying her as a White dude, and respecting her right to not have kids since she doesn’t want them is another strike against me. And I care about my Non-Christian, Gay, Transgender, and Minority friends, and will never willingly subject them to Team Pepe.

  • masquenox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    8 months ago

    You’re ignoring the big elephant in the room. This whole “lesser evilism” schtick that the bootlicker Dems have been relying on since 2016? It’s inevitably going to hit rock-bottom - and soon, too.

    • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The two party system always comes down to who runs the least shittiest candidate.

      For me. That’s not always who wins.

      • masquenox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        And as soon as the shittiest one wins, the bar for “least shittiest” drops a whole lot lower - it’s a race to the bottom.

        Of course, none of this affects policy - the class who benefits from the status quo will get what they want irregardless of who is in the Waffle House.

    • paf0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      “lesser evilism” is the entire system, since nearly the beginning.

    • jaemo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Tell me you’re not a student of history without telling me you’re not a student of history.

      • Seasm0ke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Regardless of the two party systems race to the bottom, 2016 saw the formal introduction of the Pied Piper strategy by the DNC during Hillarys campaign. Formally boosting the other parties evil factor by supporting trump and making the “vote for us, we arent them” the whole schtick.

        • masquenox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Thank you… that’s what I was referring to. Lots of people on here can’t seem to remember even back as recently as Obama’s campaign.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      This whole “lesser evilism” schtick that the bootlicker Dems have been relying on since 2016?

      Since 1948 at least.

      • masquenox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        No. Obama didn’t have to rely on it to get into the Waffle House. Back then, the Dems could still promise some kind of “progressivism” (even though they never had any intention of delivering it).

        Now look at them.

          • masquenox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            and were basically kneecapped by 1 or 2 democrats.

            Yeah… it’s amazing how that always seems to happen to anything that the rich don’t like.

          • aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            They tried to pass public option, not universal healthcare. Plus, if the rest of the democrats had really wanted it they could have done away with the filibuster and had an 8+ vote margin. But they didn’t really want it, and they wanted a convenient excuse for why they couldn’t do it, so the filibuster remains in place. And people still buy the flimsy excuse.

    • Natanael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      What kind of alarmism is this? If you want choice, push for ranked choice voting and dismantling of the republican party, then you’re free to establish however many new parties you want. Lots of countries manage to have 10+ parties on parliament

    • braxy29@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      let’s just embrace the greater evil/demonstrable threat now then, shall we?

      (/s)