

Most of those things would only be possible by hiding them in a system update
Cryptography nerd
Fediverse accounts;
@Natanael@slrpnk.net (main)
@Natanael@infosec.pub
@Natanael@lemmy.zip
Bluesky: natanael.bsky.social


Most of those things would only be possible by hiding them in a system update


It’s possible but complicated.
Since apps have access to the TPM API they can encrypt their own data in such a way that only the app’s own authorized processes can retrieve the decryption key from the TPM chip


There’s measures they could use in theory, but if you switch keyboard app away from Google’s and set private text mode, enable screenshot protection, etc, then you should be good.


For sites you visit occasionally, it’s better to enable tab isolation (use the containers feature) and then enable JS only for that domain (note the difference between allowing JS from that domain in any tab, vs only allowing that tab with that domain to use JS, you should do the latter)
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/multi-account-containers/
If you’re switching to a different browser you may as well use the same browser but a second clean profile and use private tabs so it doesn’t retain history. Using private tabs in your main browser profile does also help but isn’t perfect because there’s still some metadata leaks occasionally.
Using a different browser could ironically make you easier to track - how unique you are is the main signal used to track you (user agent, OS, language, etc), and going for an even more rare config will help their tracking even if you delete session cookies. Especially if they have a tracker across multiple domains you visit from different browsers from the same IP, with similar device fingerprinting results across browsers. That’s a strong signal those sessions are linked. You want to NOT stand out to maintain your privacy.


[Windows subsystem] for [executable environment] is the naming scheme. The default is Win32, there’s one for POSIX (practically never used), and Linux runs in another.


Malicious compliance is when you follow a order or law knowing that it will backfire on those who issued it.
“Lawfare” is a comparable term but not quite it (basically legal harassment campaigns).


This affects the view of posts via the bluesky servers, but not via mirrors or other servers
And the use of content addressing means you can be sure it hasn’t been modified


Several Android manufacturers have their own settings in the OS for battery longevity (automatic schedule based smart charging, or charging limits)
Don’t think it’s native in Android. Charging limits need support in the charging controller chip, plus driver support in the OS.


I use my backup headphones when my Bluetooth headset has run out of battery


Telegram has been under fire from the start, lol. 'we have math PhDs" 🤷


There’s also a big difference between published specifications and threat models for the encryption which professionals can investigate in the code delivered to users, versus no published security information at all with pure reverse engineering as the only option
Apple at least has public specifications. Experts can dig into it and compare against the specs, which is far easier than digging into that kind of code blindly. The spec describes what it does when and why, so you don’t have to figure that out through reverse engineering, instead you can focus on looking for discrepancies
Proper open source with deterministic builds would be even better, but we aren’t getting that out of Apple. Specs is the next best thing.
BTW, plugging our cryptography community: !crypto@infosec.pub
Looks like the same dev from reddit
https://www.reddit.com/r/crypto/comments/1iumxl3/how_far_can_i_push_closesource_code_towards_being/
Depends on where the exact cause is. Sometimes it’s fixable in another layer (like a compatibility patch in wayland) if all the data is still there, but it really should be fixed in the driver
It’s usually a driver issue as in limited support for your specific graphics card, where some features are implemented differently from other models and not covered in full by the open source drivers
This is an issue with translating the graphics buffer to the screen, it’s a driver issue. There’s differences in the graphics APIs used by older and newer games, sometimes not every version is tested for a given driver / graphics card combination, so stuff like older OpenGL games might not work the same as a newer one running on Vulkan (or which Proton can translate to Vulkan)
What else do you have installed? KDE Connect?


Yup, don’t be sole owner if you can’t afford a lawyer to make sure you get a good deal


And you can have a union even in a co-op (would mostly help if the majority / appointed leaders make decisions that break some rules, think enforcing safety rules and such)
The Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem isn’t subjective, it’s physics.
Your example isn’t great because it’s about misconceptions about the eye, not about physical limits. The physical limits for transparency are real and absolute, not subjective. The eye can perceive quick flashes of objects that takes less than a thousandth of a second. The reason we rarely go above 120 Hz for monitors (other than cost) is because differences in continous movement barely can be perceived so it’s rarely worth it.
We know where the upper limits for perception are. The difference typically lies in the encoder / decoder or physical setup, not the information a good codec is able to embedd with that bitrate.
Biking or swimming