• plyth@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Shattering? Upholding the perception.

    The next bubble is coming. Who is providing the electricity for the coming flood of chips?

  • arararagi@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 hours ago

    And then I have to read some dumbass commenting that he was the only one still fighting to keep GeForce going, while simultaneously working to keep prices high, lmao

  • geneva_convenience@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    As much as I hate Jensen, I have to admit that he was great in both being a technical visionary and also maximizing profit by extracting everything from his customers.

    So removing him as CEO in a capitalist society makes absolutely no sense to me.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 minutes ago

      My conspiracy theory is that the bag-holders didn’t want to get caught when the bubble popped, so they spun up this story of an affair with a woman who could possibly be affiliated with the Chinese government, in order to knock Nvidia off the top spot. Now, Nvidia is going to deflate, and it’s the small players holding the bags.

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I will never understand people fanboying tech CEOs/founders, or pretty much anyone honestly. Appreciate their work, if they do good work, but anything else is cringe, for lack of a better word.

        • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I imagine he and/or Nvidia thought his resignation might help him escape the 20 year federal prison sentence for his seemingly wilful violation of export control laws, and the annoying thing about it all is that it probably will.

          • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 hours ago

            We need to move away from prosecuting traitors only for them to be pardoned, and move towards angry mobs that get jury nullified.

  • danielfm123@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Nvidia manipulated prices so much, big tech abandoned the ship: Huang privately admitted that major cloud giants were pivoting away from NVIDIA in favor of in-house custom chips. With hyperscalers actively reducing their reliance on “off-the-shelf parts,”

  • Bieren@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Called this months ago. It’s basically the same as the diamond industry. Create false scarcity to increase prices.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        China mass produces lab grown diamonds that are indistinguishable from real ones. The diamond industry has put a lot of effort into convincing people they can tell real from fake, or else why would anyone pay “real” prices.

        Sort of funny there are constant mainstream news stories about the huge performance gap between “real” american GPUs and fake “chinese” GPUs.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 minutes ago

          The current (manufactured) hot thing in diamonds is highlighting flaws, like minor changes in color, to prove that it’s a natural diamond. It’s a real 180° from previous marketing that marked up “flawless” diamonds.

          Or, “Swarovski crystal”, which is glass, not diamond.

          As for the “fake Chinese GPUs”, yeah they’re ripoffs, and they’re improving their manufacturing process to catch up with the US very quickly.

  • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Man owns company that tricks sand into doing math, convinces consumer market there is a supply shortage.

    • Sheldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Tbh there is kind of a sand shortage

      Or at least we are using it up faster than it is created

      • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        10 hours ago

        To be fair, that’s referring to sand used for concrete, which needs to have a rough, jagged texture. Something that is largely achieved through water-based erosion and not wind-based erosion.

          • Auli@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Sand is not sand there are different kinds and dessert sand is way to smooth.

          • ISurvivedThePandemic@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            6 hours ago

            You can’t completely replace construction sand with desert sand but you can replace some if you also add fly-ash however this is mostly just lab studies as real life examples are extremely scarce.

            A cool thing is that you can create a type of concrete called Starcrete (https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/eng-2022-0390/html) that is 2-3 times stronger than regular concrete by mixing martian regolith and potato starch. If you lack potatoes you can also make a version of it as strong as regular concrete if you replace the starch with human blood.

  • jaykrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Artificial scarcity clearly, holding back humanity from progressing with their greed. This is why monopolies are bad.

    • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      This is why capitalism is bad.

      Capitalism would be physically impossible to maintain without artificial scarcity.

      • danielfm123@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I rather artificial scarcity million times more than the two one.

        If articial scaricity pushed too much a competitor can appear.

        • bthest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          If articial scaricity pushed too much a competitor can appear.

          Oh you mean like the stuff coming out of China or EU? The stuff that’s banned from American markets? Oh I guess not then. lol fuck off. You can’t actually believe this fairy tale shit in 2026. You just can’t.

  • VAK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    13 hours ago

    That’s what circular financing is, has no one been paying attention?

  • Tower@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Shovel maker props up mining corporations to ensure he can keep selling more shovels.

  • Nelots@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    348
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    While Jensen can’t be faulted for making these moves because he was keeping the best interests of the company in mind, it’s a stab in the back for gamers and hardware owners who are unable to locate any mouth-watering deals for GPUs or memory because of the perceived shortage.

    I really dislike this final paragraph. In one sentence, it both attempts to absolve Jensen of all fault in the current shortage, and frames gamers and hardware enthusiasts as entitled babies crying about the lack of amazing sales. Rather than the reality of high-end GPUs requiring you to take out a loan at this point, if you can even find one. I don’t need a “mouth-watering deal”, I’ll settle for affordable, thanks.

    • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      While Jensen can’t be faulted for making these moves because he was keeping the best interests of the company in mind, it does kind of suck that he’s actively destroying the planet and ruining people’s lives.

      Since when is doing business an excuse for everything? Oh, right, it’s America…

    • Rothe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      11 hours ago

      While Jensen can’t be faulted for making these moves because he was keeping the best interests of the company in mind,

      “making these moves” = market manipulation

      He sure as fuck can be faulted for that, it is literally a crime. What is this journalist smoking?

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s not even true. Because it was definitely NOT in the company‘s best interest to smuggle hardware to China. He just enabled future competitors with that move and broke the law. He also did not have to cozy up to the orange turd to keep Nvidia afloat.

      What I‘m trying to say is: He definitely did not always had Nvidia‘s interests in mind so why try to make that argument there? It‘s just dishonest.

      Besides „the law says the company must make money“ does not absolve anyone for acting morally wrong. That way of thinking is why so many things are messed up right now.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I thought China wasn’t the issue but them selling to Russia.

    • chisel@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It has a point in that Jensen was not alone in these decisions and the real blame should be placed on Nvidia as a whole. The headline pins the blame solely on Jensen, using him as a scapegoat while the actual company dodges blame and continues its anti-consumer practices.

    • BananaTrifleViolin@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      123
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Crazy final paragraph. The whole article is about Nvidia has artificially created scarcity for its products by funding AI start ups to buy it’s products.

      It is effectively buying back its own products. This alongside the circular payment systems between AI companies and Nvidia is destined to end very very badly. It can only work while the market grows and share prices go up. It is destined to be one catastrophic collapse when things go the other way.

      • ルルㇲ@retrofed.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        artificially created scarcity[…]
        circular payment systems

        gamers relearning capitalism in real time😯

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        73
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        This is only possible because the stock market is a fucking Ponzi scheme

      • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Interesting best interests. I guess Nvidia investors could all have a deep seeded masochistic and self-destruction fetish, but it sounds unlikely.

        • tankfox@bookwyr.me
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I have a deep seeded desire to have a 401k but little direct control over how much Nvidia they bought for me. Many 401k packages do not allow particularly granular investments even if I would prefer to shield myself from this obvious financial ant mill.

    • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      It’s all the consumer’s fault for wanting to consume.

      Capitalism hurt itself in its confusion!

    • halfapage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      21 hours ago

      TIL no matter what you do it’s always justified as long as you’ve had your company’s interest on your mind

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        19 hours ago

        no matter what you do it’s always justified as long as you’ve had your company’s interest on your mind

        That is exactly what the tobacco and oil companies have been arguing for decades.

        Killing your customers or the planet are much less important things than constantly increasing corporate revenue.

        • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Jup but it‘s easier to imagine what comes after the apocalypse than it is to imagine what comes after capitalism for those people. They don‘t see that the system is rigged or that CEOs of big corporations do their jobs knowing that because they are shit bags.

    • Kichae@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Few groups have been bigger apologists for their corporate abusers than capital-G Gamers. They would have followed Nvidia into hell itself so long as Huang blew even the thinnest wisps of smoke up their unwashed asses. Discovering that their hardware suppliers have only ever used them for their money has seriously hurt their egos and broken their brains.

      It’s like Gamers thought they were dating the most popular kid in school, only to discover that they were only hanging out with Gamers because Gamers’ mom had an old Mustang that she like them drive. Now they’re dating someone rich college student who owns a Porche, and they’re not returning Gamers’ calls, and they’re going through all of the phase of teenage grief.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Discovering that their hardware suppliers have only ever used them for their money has seriously hurt their egos and broken their brains.

        I get what you’re trying to say here, but this part is literally just how retail works. I pay you money, you give me the goods I want, and the money I pay you enables you to stay in business producing whatever it is for when I need another one.

        I think basically the entirety of Nvidia’s leadership could be pushed into a volcano and the average value of humanity would slightly increase. But expecting their operation to be some kind of charity is a bit silly.

        The major thing that us capital-G gamers have been pissed about, and rightfully so, is not only Nvidia’s rather well documented abuse of its consumer side customer base for a very long time but also the fact that they’re functionally the only game in town for a lot of purposes. Now it turns out that this is for completely artificial reasons, i.e. Jensen Hwang formerly of Nvidia and Lisa Su of AMD are literally blood related to each other and privately agreed not to compete with each other in the high end consumer GPU market. So by design there isn’t even any competition. AMD “wins” in processors and Nvidia “wins” in video cards and both of them can therefore just charge whatever the fuck they want. That is indeed some bullshit.

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        And don’t forget tech “reviewers” like Linus who badmouth Nvidia and then only show their fucking GPUs in every video that isn’t an AMD benchmark

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        20 hours ago

        NAILED. IT. I’d love all the people who feel they have a right to video cards explain that to a Palestinian orphan.

        • Nelots@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          11 hours ago

          This isn’t a suffering competition, you’re being ridiculous. You can say that about literally anything anybody complains about. No, while the things happening in Palestine are fucking horrific, “but worse things happen” doesn’t invalidate other peoples’ problems.

          Frankly you sound like an ass even comparing the two.

          • VeloRama@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            gaming graphics card scalping is literally a first world luxury “problem”.

            • Nelots@piefed.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Yes, it is a first world problem. That doesn’t invalidate it. Fun fact, first world problems are still problems! If you had said that in response to people pretending the inability to buy a graphics card is as bad as a kid having their leg blown off, I would have no issue with your comment. But nobody is doing that, so it’s a stupid ass argument.

          • shalafi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            16 hours ago

            An orphan, is by definition, alive. No one talks about “dead orphans”. Bruce Wayne isn’t a “live orphan”.

            Anyway, my comment was about the privilege Western gamers have in 2026.

            “NOAAWW! You can’t take away my high-end video cards! I have the RIGHT to play video games at a reasonable price!”

            Imagine explaining your vast suffering under these filthy capitalists from your watertight, HVAC controlled domicile. Said suffering is way overblown on lemmy.

            • kopasz7@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              15 hours ago

              I hope you think of people with no legs when you stub your toe in the dark.

              (Invalidating anyone’s suffering on the basis that someone else out there has it worse would mean that nobody else is justified to suffer than the absolutely most miserable. Suffering is an inescapable facet of the human condition, but it doesn’t mean we shoudn’t try reducing it.)

            • dontbelievethis@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              15 hours ago

              If the parents die it’s an orphan. If the orphan then dies it is a dead orphan.

              Chiming in with “there is greater misery in the world” is so tonedeaf. Yes, we all know. What does this has to do with the Problem that is discussed?

              Go to therapy if all that is laying so heavy on you that you have to make every discussion about what’s on your mind.

    • absquatulate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I mean bootlicking aside, they’re not wrong. Jensen’s a corpo and they will always chase profits. Sometimes stooping to borderline illegal maneuvers like this price fixing thing or the ram cartel. In an ideal world these fuckers would get prosecuted and do jail time, but as it stands we are somewhat at their whims. That’s why I don’t get this entitlement with affordable gpu’s - they’re high tech components and for a while they were more affordable but gamers are no longer the most profitable market so yhings change. There was no “betrayal” and no “abandonment” because no one owes gamers anything, just like they don’t owe the companies anything. Shit’s bkt affordable? Short of a class action lawsuit, tough luck, adapt and move on, because it looks like we’re heading back to the gpu wild west of the late 90s.

      • Rothe@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 hours ago

        That’s not the point though.

        The journalist literally wrote that he cannot be faulted for committing crimes in the interest of his company. He absolutely can be faulted for that.

      • tankfox@bookwyr.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        You’re getting blasted for this because people don’t want to hear it, not because anything you said was wrong.

        The only part I disagree with is the 90s style wild west theme; that would require competition of which none will be able to grow. It’s impossible to catch up to where high end GPU market is right now without an insane investment that could never be recouped. Why would ANYONE bother spending billions trying to white-room a new competing GPU architecture from the ground up just to slip into fourth place behind Intel’s 1% market share? Especially since, as you pointed out, the established players don’t have to follow any laws especially when it comes to buying up and dissolving any and all competition in their field.

        • Rothe@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          No, they are getting blasted for agreeing with the batshit take of the journalist claiming that Jensen cannot be faulted for committing crimes in the interests of his company.

          • tankfox@bookwyr.me
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            That’s not how I read it at all, it looks to me as if he’s ACKNOWLEDGING the actual fact that nvidia was able to commit those crimes with absolute impunity, has not been held individually or collectively responsible, and probably won’t in any time-frame that’s going to realistically change the course of these events.

            He cannot be faulted by people who won’t fault him. Laws that are not enforced are more like suggestions.