Hello, maybe it’s out of scope of this community, but it’s an haunting question i can’t answer and i hope someone could do it for me: what’s the logic behind the reasoning of Jenner about the trans cause? It seems that she zigzags permanently in this subject. She in turn:
-a misaimed transactivist
-a boomrang bigot
-disinteresed of transactivism
-asking seemingly deliberately to leopards to eat her face
-whining when it happens but still loyal to the said leopards
-advocating for the said leopards going vegan
I don’t get the logic behind her reasoning since it’s not remotely consistent (outside her endorsement to the GOP), it’s worse than people who are stubborn about their opinions, who are at least coherent with themselves.
Not all people are logical. I had a coworker who honestly thought all women were better than all men and all dogs were better than all people, in every category, for both. She argued that endurance was a more important athletic skill than strength for humans but not for dogs and that speed was only important if it was significantly faster than humans can run. You could argue her into the tightest of corners and she’d walk through the walls because she didn’t have any internal logic.
She was really capable in an academic sense, but it was impossible for me to consider her smart. She was pretty fun though, and wasn’t shitty to the men in her life or anything, bizarrely. She did not make it known to them in any way and she behaved perfectly kindly towards them, she just didn’t respect them. She was like the inverse of the better husbands in mad men (minus the cheating and/or abuse- I only watched the first season, so I don’t know how bad it gets).
I wouldn’t really say we were friends, because it made it really hard to respect her, but we were friendly in the huge, hostile office with 95% of the staff at least twenty years our senior.