• red_pigeon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    50
    ·
    11 months ago

    Won’t they start pulling more and more tax for it then ? Having it private keeps the competition at least, wouldn’t you agree ?

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Your taxes already subsidize it. You just don’t see any benefits for your money in the current system because they pocket it without making upgrades.

    • eating3645@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      11 months ago

      ISPs in the US are notorious for getting public funds for services that they never provide, so I wouldn’t be too concerned about that.

      • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Exactly. They’re getting massive handouts from our money. Let’s cut out the middlemen and pay a utility directly.

    • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      11 months ago

      What competition? Tax me and give me fucking municipal fiber instead of giving giant paychecks to wealthy assholes who invest nothing in improving the service but raise everyone’s rates regardless.

    • marx2k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      11 months ago

      Ah yes competition. I get to choose between two providers, charter and at&t. Same price, about the same speeds.

      • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        11 months ago

        They also tend to deliberately stay out of each other’s service areas so they can ramp up prices with de facto local monopolies.

    • rusticus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Please tell us how “keeping it private” ensures competition and prevents monopolies. For extra credit, let us know WHO is responsible for preventing monopolies.

      • red_pigeon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        Where did I say it prevents monopolies ?

        Where I’m from if it goes public I’m sure the govt is going to take advantage of it with piss poor speeds. When it’s private, at least there are companies competing with decent speeds even though it’s expensive. It’s a choice between the lesser of two evils.

        • rusticus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Where I’m from private is slower, more expensive, capped, and throttled. Public is faster, cheaper, unlimited and unregulated. And private lobby’s/bribes politicians to put laws in place preventing public.

    • BossDj@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I guess to answer that, wonder if your water, electric, or waste companies are gouging you. If they are, like in Texas, then yeah maybe?

      Everywhere I lived, people and voting have strong control over utilities and they are fairly priced because it’s a service not a business

    • Montagge@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      Where I use to live was all private. CenturyLink was the only option as they had an agreement with Comcast that Comcast wouldn’t come into my area.

      I paid $60/month for 500kbps down. Yes kilobits.