Once Russia defeats Ukraine, I think it’s very possible that Hungary and Slovakia are going to end up exiting the EU and joining BRICS. Right now, they’re surrounded by hostile countries, and have no direct route to the east, but once Ukraine falls the situation changes completely. And I think at that point, other countries might follow as well.
Also the ironic fact is also that Brussels is literally the capitol.
This kinda posts make me hope for better future for europe
This article is from December 10th 2025. This is already old hat five times over.
Since this article was put out, we’ve had:
- The EU agree to a €90 billion loan package, not taken from frozen Russian funds but instead funded by borrowing from the EU capital market.
- The USA illegaly invade Venezuela and kidnap Maduro.
- Two innocent American citizens being shot dead by ICE agents, triggering large scale protests in Minneapolis.
- The USA threatening to annex Greenland again, throwing the EU into a brief panic before it was all quickly forgotten like last year.
- The USA and Israel starting an illegal war against Iran, throwing the world economy into turmoil, which is currently ongoing.
And it’s only been 3 months! Safe to say that absolutely nobody cares about Belgium anymore.
Can someone dumb this down for an American?
The EU is supposed to be this democratic entity that respects the sovereignty of members, yet as soon as a country, like Hungary, steps out of line and refuses to be forced to send money and weapons to the Nazi Kiev regime, refuses to sacrifice their own energy security for the sake of the EU’s anti-Russia crusade, the EU immediately starts rewriting its own rules, does away with unanimity requirements, and tries to take away Hungary’s vote (in addition to taking away Hungary’s EU funds, funding opposition parties, trying for years to overthrow its government).
Now that Belgium has recently opposed stealing Russian frozen reserves, which would irreparably trash the credibility of European financial institutions (many of which are located in Belgium) and precipitate a major crisis, the EU is threatening to treat them the same way: as a rogue element to be crushed and forced back in line.
We already know that the EU blatantly rigs elections in member states, they did it just recently in Romania and Moldova in the most obvious way. It is clear that it is becoming increasingly desperate and tyrannical in trying to enforce a central political line and prevent members from exercising national sovereignty.
The more that the economic crisis in Europe spirals, the more of this type of dysfunction and internal conflict we will see. The more the pie shrinks the more everyone will fight over the pieces. The EU is crumbling under the weight of its own contradictions and the defeat of NATO’s proxy war in Ukraine has accelerated that process.
What is most surprising about this is that it’s a Western European country that is in the crosshairs this time. This is unusual in terms of the racist hierarchy that exists in the EU where normally the Eastern and Southern European members, being effectively internal colonies of the EU, are on the receiving end of EU financial, legal and administrative punishment.
It’s important that you understand when framing your response, that the other guy actually believes the thing’s hes saying.
Ok, would you explain what exactly is incorrect? Is the rest of the EU not changing the rules and using other tools to pressure Belgium into supporting their war effort at the expense of their financial sectors reputation?
I can’t dig into who is influencing European elections and how, but the rest of it seems to be congruent with the article what (admittedly little) I already know.
I mean every single sentence has some ugly falsehood. There’s no point in addressing nonsense like claiming that the EU will “crush” Belgium like it’s crushed Hungary (what), that NATO has been defeated in Ukraine (what), that the EU rigs elections in member states (what). That’s not what I’m here for. These people are lost.
The important thing is that this person believes, or consistently acts as if they believe, that all these things are true. They’re not being rhetorical, those are the things that inform their opinions. You need to consider this when assessing what they say. Like, if you want to ask about the EU being fascists now apparently, consider that the evidence is things like crushing the independence of union states, rigging elections, and being defeated in border wars. Can we think of any nation state this actually applies to? Why would a person have such a blind spot?
Vote Rigging in Moldova’s 2025 Parliamentary Elections
Moldova’s Pro-EU Party Wins Vote Due To Manipulation And EU Interference
Romania’s stolen elections were only the start: Inside the EU’s war on democracy
EU interventionism in national elections: Who’s next?
EU official plotted to ‘organise resistance’ against Hungary’s Orban
EU Trying for Regime Change in Hungary
EU Weighs Blocking Slovakia Funds (Due to Opposition to Ukraine War)
Robert Fico’s failed assassination raises specter of Western plotting
Of course, that’s the ONE comment that TheOctonaut did not find worthy of a reply. 🤣
Welcome to Lemmygrad, maybe you’ll stay a while and expose yourself to perspectives different from your own, and maybe even change your mind based on new evidence.
Yeah, no, I’m familiar and as it turns out repeating nonsense from “Telegram sources” isn’t changing my opinions of anything. As someone who has literally voted for communist candidates in elections in the last year, I’m glad to have grown up before this type of American sports-team need for religious unquestioning, black and white adherence to whatever the online bubble is totally organically pushing. If someone wants to in a handful of words categorise Hungary as “crushed” or Ukraine as “Nazi” that’s not a serious line of thought that needs to be interrogated. Its source does.
Until my new PieFed client figures out how to block instances, please don’t expect me to engage with naked fluff talking points on here. I’m interested in speaking to people about how they themselves engage with it.
Of course, I’ll likely just be banned, because engaging with other viewpoints is not exactly as encouraged here as you’ve suggested.
Of course, I’ll likely just be banned, because engaging with other viewpoints is not exactly as encouraged here as you’ve suggested.
You haven’t engaged with anything from what I can gather. All you’ve done is come in here and talk down to others about what they believe, how they think, and the sources they’re using. That is the part that’s “online bubble” behavior, that you refuse to even engage with alternatives to what you already think. It’s like coming into a place and taking a shit on the floor, and then saying, “Wow, it stinks in here! You must really like the smell of shit to let it stink so bad in here!”
You’ve misunderstood what I meant by “source”. I meant “who is benefiting from making young leftists think like this” not “lol nice substack bro”.
Rest is spot on though 🫡
this isn’t reddit shithead
Ah yogszy! Been a while since I saw your name. How’s the collapse of the west progressing? Imminent, I believe it was. In 2024.
voted for a communist candidates in elections last year
How’s that going btw?
One billion times more productive than posting about Russia on discussion board
I dont understand the EU at all, and I live in it
Many such cases.
deleted by creator





