We know that women students and staff remain underrepresented in Higher Education STEM disciplines. Even in subjects where equivalent numbers of men and women participate, however, many women are still disadvantaged by everyday sexism. Our recent research found that women who study STEM subjects at undergraduate level in England were up to twice as likely as non-STEM students to have experienced sexism. The main perpetrators of this sexism were not university staff, however, but were men STEM degree students.

  • WeeSheep@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    The undergrad boys in STEM I swear have never met a woman aside from their mothers. No, please don’t follow me home. Please don’t buy me food because I was next to you in line. Please don’t follow me into a store so you can buy me anything I’m purchasing. You are not invited into my conversation because you think I’m pretty, even if you just want to interrupt to tell me I’m pretty and you want to take me on a date. You are not allowed to hug me and hold me as long as you want just because you want to and it feels good for you, I didn’t want a hug and I didn’t know you. It isn’t cute for you to take things from me and play keep away because you are stronger and taller, it makes you a bully.

    Teachers: please don’t ignore me when I try and participate or ask a question. I’ve gotten Cs with no explanation, no marks aside from the grade itself. When I check other’s work, theirs is written up with mistakes and they have a higher grade. Honestly that was just one teacher in an undergrad, the rest were pretty awesome, or at least not sexist.

    • WHARRGARBL@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      My CS classes were 90% male, and every professor was male, too. They all genuinely enjoyed my participation, and it was the only environment where I wasn’t objectified or disrespected. Same with my coworkers (again 90% male) when I went into the FAANG workforce; the men were happy to see women excel in a previously male-only field.

      The general public was a different story until recently. Women were thrilled, a disturbing number of men refused to listen to me.

      • Ilflish@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        It probably depends on the university. There are definitely dregs of “incel” culture that get in but they can’t socialize and are usually left alone. In the workforce, interviews stop them from getting much further then that.

    • Sunfoil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      They probably haven’t. My experience was a lot of these guys were on the spectrum and the only social understanding of women they have is media. I would say the sexism is very malicious from the faculty, but from fellow students a lot of them this is the first time they’ve been allowed away from their helicopter parents and to begin learning social skills, sadly at your detriment.

      • WeeSheep@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Fortunately the ones who seemed socially awkward were the ones who did understand no. The majority who gave me scares were likely on the spectrum but none went too far. The ones who went too far and never respected no were definitely not on the spectrum, they were self centered and didn’t pay attention to others.

        There are plenty of men who act like boys because they have seen grace for their actions their whole lives. The result is that they cannot learn from their actions because they never learned how. They cannot understand when others don’t let them do whatever they want, and they don’t recognize consequences for their actions because they never had any. This may describe some on the spectrum but it has nothing to do with autism.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      11 months ago

      I swear have never met a woman aside from their mothers

      Are they less likely to behave this way after meeting you or is this sentence the essence of how you would react to their behavior?

      (I haven’t done any of the things mentioned and they are inappropriate, but in retrospective think that maybe I should have, since being too polite and shy at the same time is apparently even less attractive, and reduces experience in communication, which is the only way one can learn to communicate.)

      • Urist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Just like there are lots of jerks and incels, there are lots of really nice shy guys that would make the world a better place by opening up a little more. Being brave at making contact is totally acceptable, and probably good for you, if you do it in a respectful manner. Actual nice guys should drown out the jerks that are self proclaimed nice guys by treating women, men and themselves with respect.

        • WeeSheep@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Should, yes. They don’t always. And there are still far more than enough guys (and people) who do nothing when they see women (or others) treated very poorly but men/boys. I sort of understand college and high school, everyone is exploring and unsure what’s ok, and observers may be entirely unsure what to do.

          It’s pretty common for a bunch of people to see something bad happen and everyone think someone should do something without realizing they are someone who could do something.

          • RealBot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            11 months ago

            So you first said they try to do/offer to do something like walk you home, buy you something, etc. and you said you don’t want that. Now here you say you want them to do something, in particular when they see something bad happening (i think you meant when they see girl treated poorly by a boy/man). That seems kind of confusing.

            • WeeSheep@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              11 months ago

              If someone wants to try making friends, it’s reasonable for them to try and start a conversation. If the person they are pursuing isn’t interested, LEAVE THEM ALONE. CONSENT IS IMPORTANT.

              If I’m screaming for help, if I’m being attacked, if I cannot defend myself, even if you see someone not respecting someone else’s consent, help the person who’s consent is not being respected. CONSENT IS IMPORTANT.

              Hope this helps.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          In real life what “respectful manner” is becomes a matter of whether another person (and their friends) likes you or not. Sometimes retroactive.

          I don’t like this attribution of some kind of affinity to justice to “people” or “men” or “women” or whatever. “People” are a rather cruel and fallacious substance most of the time.

          Also jerks and incels may be that not entirely through their own fault. There may be wrong upbringing, or some trauma, which others consciously or unconsciously trigger, or whatever else, humans are complex and putting labels in such a way is disgusting.

          • Urist@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Incel is an abbreviation of involuntary celibate. It is 100 % a self proclaimed title from the word “involuntary”. I am merely categorizing those that label themselves as such to be often having a distorted view on sex and women. None of this was a philosophical debate on the existence of evil and my point was clearly defined: Timid, kind people should be a little bolder. Everyone should be mindful of other people’s boundaries.

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Incel is an abbreviation of involuntary celibate. It is 100 % a self proclaimed title

              Only when it’s used to refer to yourself, and when you use it to refer to others, it’s not self-proclaimed.

              I am merely categorizing those that label themselves as such to be often having a distorted view on sex and women.

              Ah, so you mean literal members of that subculture. When you say “incels and jerks” it may really seem like it was used in a wider meaning. OK, I have no more questions on incels.

              Timid, kind people should be a little bolder. Everyone should be mindful of other people’s boundaries.

              And my point was that boundaries are never that clearly defined. Socialized people work with them on instinct, others can’t do that.

              In general we usually don’t see what we consider a given, and so our advice to people lacking it is useless.

              If you are wondering what’s the emotional reason of me participating in this thread (despite everything, I’ve not been an incel literally, and everyone has been a jerk), it’s the contempt for unhappy people. That it was expressed for only some of them and not all doesn’t change the essence.

              • Urist@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Socialized people work with them on instinct, others can’t do that.

                This is a valid point. Some on the autism spectrum, for example, have difficulties due to lack of this instinct.

                And my point was that boundaries are never that clearly defined.

                This is also true, but not so much a problem. Everyone is bound to overstep at some point. However, that is most likely going to yield a negative response from the other person, and it is actually somewhat their responsibility to express this plainly. Where jerks and unaware people diverge in action is how they respond to being made aware. Say sorry and not push further and you are in the clear.

                I will admit there is a little bit of a problem with a supreme narrative based on personal experience if applied indiscriminately in every context. However, as long as it is confined to one’s own body, it is perfectly fine since everyone should have their bodily autonomy respected and thus their experience is the supreme narrative in this instance always.

                There are training one can do if one lacks social intuitition and basic rules like do not touch at spots other than briefly on shoulders etc. without consent. I have lots of sympathy for all those who struggle socially, but do not see laxing on demanding respect for others as being helpful in any way. I would also speak up if someone ridiculed a nice person for being just awkward, but that is not the issue discussed here.

                • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Yeah, I didn’t mean anything like touching others without consent. I don’t think we disagree in anything significant.

      • WeeSheep@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I always hope people learn from their experience. I have no idea if they learned anything after interacting with me or assumed I’m some crazy female.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          I meant that this quote is extremely humiliating, especially to people for whom it’s true. It’s hard to learn from cruelty, even if it’s unintended.

          • CulturedLout@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            From your perspective, what was cruel? I’m interested in how different people interpret the same scenarios. What would be a more constructive way to address the situation?

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              11 months ago

              I assumed quite a few things. If I guessed correctly, then:

              Telling somebody that they are not good enough to talk to because of not knowing how to do that is cruel because it gives them no escape, since they can’t change their past, and can’t catch on since you won’t talk to them.

              A constructive way to address the situation would be telling them something more rude and direct, but also less humiliating, like “I didn’t ask you to do that”, “I wasn’t talking to you” or just telling them to fsck off. Just imagining what you’d say if it were a girl behaving this way and reacting accordingly.

              That quote doesn’t simply lose gender roles in conversation, it uses them to say that the other side is inferior in that regard.

              • prole@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                11 months ago

                Telling somebody that they are not good enough to talk to because of not knowing how to do that is cruel because it gives them no escape

                Not really… First, I don’t think they ever said that those people “weren’t good enough” to talk to. Those are your words.

                But also, there is a very obvious “escape” when you’re ignorant or uneducated about something. It’s called learning.