skepller@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 1 year agoChina Is Joining Russia’s Shadow War on Europewww.bloomberg.comexternal-linkmessage-square63linkfedilinkarrow-up177arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up173arrow-down1external-linkChina Is Joining Russia’s Shadow War on Europewww.bloomberg.comskepller@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square63linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareQuittenbrot@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year ago I obviously don’t see the need in this case. It’s not prose but facts. Since you “obviously don’t see the need” to read it, yet still feel the need to regularly cite it, I’d like to know which facts from this book you are talking about.
minus-squareplyth@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoIn the same way that the words you are reading right now are not imaginary.
minus-squareQuittenbrot@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoThere’s a difference between opinions and facts.
minus-squareplyth@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoWhen the topic is ideas then ideas are facts.
minus-squareQuittenbrot@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoAnd you think this book contains facts about ‘the structure of the war’?
Since you “obviously don’t see the need” to read it, yet still feel the need to regularly cite it, I’d like to know which facts from this book you are talking about.
The concepts
They are facts to you?
In the same way that the words you are reading right now are not imaginary.
There’s a difference between opinions and facts.
When the topic is ideas then ideas are facts.
Which topic?
The structure of the war.
And you think this book contains facts about ‘the structure of the war’?