• null@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Do you think Lemmy is free? Your admin is paying, and trusting you to donate to help out.

    • Jrockwar@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Uh, what a weird message. It’s not only unrelated to what I said but it reads like an attempt to twist my words. On top of it, it’s totally wrong: Lemmy is free. I can self host Lemmy on a raspberry pi for exactly 0€.

      The instance I use… Is also free. I donate because I choose to, but if my friend can’t afford to donate they can still use the instance. Nobody is profiting from it.

      What I did talk about is products and doing business with corporations. With Lemmy there’s no product, whether you pay or not. With SearxNG (which many people self host, and again, is free) you’re not the product, regardless of how much you pay.

      That’s what I was replying to - your comment is way off the mark and very condescending: I don’t need to be mansplained that I should donate to the software I already donate to. Note donate rather than pay for.

      • null@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Lemmy is free. I can self host Lemmy on a raspberry pi for exactly 0€.

        Dang, where can I get a free Raspberry Pi and internet connection? That sounds awesome!

        The instance I use… Is also free. I donate because I choose to, but if my friend can’t afford to donate they can still use the instance. Nobody is profiting from it.

        This is exactly my point. It’s like when people call it “free healthcare”.

    • Muyal_Hix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Ironic considering the pinned post on .world is the admins asking for donations and pretty much everyone is saying “no”

      • dgdft@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        You misunderstood the pinned post; it’s soliciting donations for core Lemmy development, not for the .world instance.

        The core devs use donations to the project to fund their tankie .ml instance, which is why they’re getting pushback. There is zero comparable pushback among the community towards funding .world or other instances.

        • Muyal_Hix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Functionally there’s no difference.

          The person I replied argued that you are obligated to donate if you want to keep Lemmy free. Right now the Lemmy developers are asking for donations, and people are saying no.

          The developers are openly communist, and if you want to use Lemmy you’ll have to learn to live .ml, it’s not going to change.

          • dgdft@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            43 minutes ago

            There is a massive functional difference to anyone with two braincells to rub together.

            The core devs can (and should) step in front of a bus (or tank) tomorrow; the core project will just fork, and LW and the other non-triad instances will do fine without them. I’ve had no issue on Lemmy blocking .ml client-side.

            The only reminder of the triad’s existence is infiltrator trolls who make alts on other instances to post bad-faith arguments glazing the core devs.