The American empire, that colossus of the modern age, is not what it once was. Its hegemony is now fraying at the edges, and its vassals must confront an uncomfortable truth. The incoming administration, with a more pragmatic and unflinching view of America’s decline, is taking steps to draw lines around its sphere of influence.
The US does not have allies who are equal partners and decision makers. It uses vassals, bound to the American sphere by a web of feudal obligations, elite integration, and geopolitical utility. Some provide military bases; others, economic leverage. Some serve as ideological outposts; others, as buffers against rival powers. But all exist within the gravitational pull of the American empire, their orbits determined by the whims and needs of their overlord. And now, as the empire seeks to shore up its position, it is only logical that it would demand more from its subjects. Satellite nations will be expected to increase NATO budgets, suffer tariffs, and even make territorial concessions.
The moment of reckoning has arrived, and countries who have become dependent on the US must now face the reality that their security, prosperity, and very identities have been contingent on the strength and benevolence of the hegemon. They must now decide how to navigate the new reality they find themselves in. Broadly speaking, there are three paths that are available. The vassals can seek protection outside the American sphere, deepen their integration and make themselves useful to the empire, or simply endure the increasing demands with resigned acceptance. Each path carries its own risks and rewards, but none offers the comfort of the status quo.
For example, Denmark has become a quintessential vassal state, its military stripped bare, and its foreign policy subsumed into the broader aims of the US. It sent its soldiers to fight in distant wars, not for its own interests, but as a gesture of fealty to its overlord. And what has it gained in return? The privilege of not being punished themselves. But as the empire tightens its grip on the remaining assets, Denmark, and nations like it, must confront their own impotence. They cannot defend themselves. They cannot seek help from their peers who are equally feeble. And so, they will likely endure the demands placed upon them because they have grown accustomed to their subservient role.
What the vassals are still struggling to understand is that the US owes them nothing. The notion that these nations deserve better treatment is a quaint relic of a bygone era. The world is not a place of fairness or justice; it is a place of power and necessity. Those who complain about their rising obligations are missing the point. The reward for their loyalty is not prosperity or autonomy, but the absence of punishment. This is the cold truth of empire.
The global order of American unipolarity where the world was policed by a single superpower is gone. It is not coming back. The mirage of a post-historical utopia, where conflicts are minor and challenges are manageable, has evaporated. The rules-based order that the western nations hid behind has been revealed as a fragile construct, dependent on the strength and will of its enforcer. As that enforcer weakens, all the dependents must now confront their own vulnerability.
It’s not a pleasant realization. It is not easy to admit that one’s existence has been a coddled theme park, dependent on the relative position of a distant power. But it is a necessary to start making hard decisions about the future. The nations in the US sphere of influence must reckon with their own geopolitical impotence and choose between embracing their dependency with open eyes or seeking pathways to autonomy. The latter path will require risk, sacrifice, and a fundamental recalibration of national priorities. But it may be the only way to reclaim a measure of historical agency.
The era of coasting on borrowed security and ideological rhetoric is over. The vassals must now confront the reality of their situation, not as passive recipients of American largesse, but as active participants in a changing world. They must decide whether to cling to the fading light of the empire or to seek new opportunities. For some, the choice may be clear. For others, it may be agonizing. But one thing is certain, there is no going back to the world the way it was before 2022. Countries will either rise to the occasion or fade into irrelevance. In the grand scheme of things, empires rise and fall. But the choices made in the twilight of the empire will shape the world for decades to come.
Oh Canada, gonna cling to the US to the bitter end. My opinion is that Canada will be the last state to decouple with the US if it even remains one at all.
The future is bleak here from that sense.
I expect so as well, Canada is completely dependent on the US economically at this point and there’s no real path to decouple.
Do you think that has to do with geography as well as ideology?
Among other things such as economy like Yogthos said and security state intertwinement.
A lot of this wouldn’t matter if European vassals could all band together in solidarity. But now we see why the rise of the proto and neo fascist groups in Europe is critic to the US strategy - there must be foils that threaten individual nations in Europe in order for European nations to need the protection that the US can provide.
Personally, I’m skeptical that any sort of European unity was ever possible in the long term.
Long term is impossible for sure, but i can see some short term unity under the “protect the garden” rhetoric of recent.
I expect we’ll see ladder pulling by countries that are better off and more infighting as a result. The EU elites will keep bleating about their garden, but nobody really believes in that outside of Brussels. When push comes to shove people want to protect their own standard of living. Hence why we see pro EU political factions collapsing all across Europe now.
What’s the path to sustainability then?
Why assume that there is one?
In order to find it and strive for it
In my view, the current European order is fundamentally flawed, and it needs to be torn down and rebuilt from the ground up. However, the current elites will fight that tooth and nail hence the current decline is likely to continue in the coming decades. As Gramsci put it, the old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born.
I mean, that’s a path to sustainability - societal collapse in Europe and then rebuilding from New power structures and principles
In fact, that’s likely the only realistic path towards sustainability. However, it’s important to keep in mind the fact that a collapse will be an incredibly painful and traumatizing event for Europe. I lived through USSR collapse, and I wouldn’t wish that on anyone. The most important task for communists in Europe is to prepare for what’s coming, and to provide leadership in the time of crisis.
EU countries ruling class have made it clear that they chose the latter, but i wonder if their workers will follow along, as they’ve done historically, or will they finally wake up.
I think we’re already seeing the working majority rebelling against the elites as they see their standard of living collapse. Right now there’s still very little class consciousness to be had, but that will develop in due time.
This sounds strikingly similar to what Russians With Attitude wrote, up to certain phrases matching 1:1 (secondary source here; CW: cringe reactionary)
Oh yeah I read through that earlier, and figured I’d do my own write up without linking a reactionary source. I guess I could’ve given them credit.
Yeah, I think it’s better to separate the wheat from the chud. Reading their rants about “globalists” and “wokeness” gets a bit tiring. In any case, they didn’t write anything groundbreakingly new or outwordly. Historical materialism or something
That was my thinking as well. It’s not like there was some unique insight there, but the gist of it was worth sharing.
I’ve been bumbling around with similar thoughts for a bit. Thanks for posting because I probably wasn’t going to.
Honestly I think the whole american withdrawal is a nonstarter. There are too many vested interests that won’t be happy about it. Someone will manage to start a war that sucks america in and we will get WW3 before america pulls back.
I’d love to see it happen but usa will never give up on isisrael, so it will never give up on the bases in west Asia, and never give up supporting the gulf monarchs, and never give up its influence on turkey, so it wont be able to pull out of europe.
While WW3 can’t be ruled out, I don’t think it’s inevitable. These things are hard to predict, but I get the impression that the oligarchs in the states are starting to slowly realize they’re not omnipotent. Another big factor is that they are highly dependent on China economically, and there are a lot of very powerful interests that will fight that dependence tooth an nail. There’s also the question of the domestic economic situation in US that’s rapidly deteriorating. If a major financial crisis hits, then the US simply might not be in a position to pursue global ambitions.
It’s also worth noting the levels of deindustrialization in the west. I think it maybe a unique situation in human history for a society to have outsourced so much their core production capacity. Rebuilding manufacturing, creating new supply chains, securing resources, and training workers, is a decades long project under the best of circumstances. It’s simply not clear how US could fight a major in its current state.
great post. do you write a blog or anythin
Just post on here mostly. I did end up writing this recently https://theunconductedchorus.com/
right on, great work yog
deleted by creator
Did a chud write this? Reads like something a wehraboo would come up with lol