• spider@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    we live in a country with a two-party system

    Although they’re perpetually marginalized, we do have third-party candidates.

    Edit: Amusing how people downvote a neutral, factual statement.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      They’ll never have a chance in a winner-take-all electoral college system.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      You’ll never convince 160 million people to vote 3rd party. So a vote for 3rd party is a vote for the most popular of the 2 candidates.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        Ελληνικά
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        No, a vote 3rd party is a vote against your most tolerable of the two viable candidates.

      • pedalmore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The key here is that it’s a vote for the most popular of the 2 candidates based on the votes of who bothered to vote for them specifically, then further butchered via the EC. It’s a smaller, different pool of people that may elect someone that the actual majority prefer less, because part of the actual majority decided to play a different game entirely.