

Then eating roadside possum will cure you of not having something else. Also, have you considered swimming in sewerage?
Then eating roadside possum will cure you of not having something else. Also, have you considered swimming in sewerage?
Huh?? If a streaming site (or any product for that matter) is free, the user is the product - be it their time, personal info, whatever. It is known and accepted that a “free” service will have a catch that allows the provider to make money.
If a user PAYS for a service it is expected that the payment is enough remuneration for there to be no strings attached. Of course companies will look for shitty ways to do shitty things to make more money, and those companies ought to be punished, generally by a reduction in customers, for their shitty behaviour.
Fair enough. I find Friends to be incredibly unfunny and can’t stand sitting through a single episode. Frasier, on the other hand, I find to be pretty entertaining (until Niles and Daphne get together, then the wheels start falling off).
There’s a boardgame I would like to get the occasionally shows up on marketplace. Once I get it, it’s account deletion time.
As others have said, it’s not about making it easy, it’s about making it safe. If they’re in a comfortable environment where they can take their time things will work about a lot better. Equating this to a “hookup hotel” is just disingenuous.
Surprised not to see Generation Kill here. I’ll watch it twice a year. Along with, as mentioned by many above, Seinfeld, Firefly, Community (preferably early seasons) etc.
But not if they’re the ones doing the illegal stuff, apparently.
I’m happy to be corrected, but my understanding is this all stems from a MegaLag video published a month ago. There would be no need for LegalEagle to republish all the claims and it understandably takes some time to file suit. In short, the info was already out there for everyone to see.
I’d suggest they know growth of the platforms is waning, if not going backwards, but if they create a heap of bots and call them “active users” then the share price won’t go down. That’s the only reason I can think of.
Looking at me when they’re talking. I don’t care for the politeness of it, just watch the road!
Yeah 1896 was pretty bad for computer games in general. And computers.
They have a concept of quitting.
Boy are you in for a shock when you hear about Project 2025. This stuff is straight out of their playbook, with more to come.
You dumb, dumb motherfuckers.
Regards, the rest of the world.
I feel that divergence is what made DS9 so good. Instead of travelling around exploring aliens, we’re stationary exploring ourselves and our politics. It was a great idea to make a show about a completely different aspect of Starfleet life. Unfortunately, in my opinion, the last great idea they had.
Well at least 2016 got us “Pokemon Go… to the polls!” Eeesh
You know how you have to prepare your house when someone is bringing their kids over (especially if you don’t have kids of your own) ? That what this is. Things have got so bad that they have to bring in a bunch of new rules just so one adult can finish speaking without a other “adult” talking over them the whole time. Holy shit, this is what it has come to.
And she’s a cunt, right?
I’m not from the US so I’m not entirely sure what was wrong, but fair enough I guess.
Ikr. Python does kinda suck as a language.