Wow that actually looks really cool. Now, how much do I owe you?
Wow that actually looks really cool. Now, how much do I owe you?
This take will probably be unpopular, but FWIW I agree with you. I rarely use the community feature and I don’t care about the trading so personally I would like it if they just stuck with what they do well.
“And here is my hard drive dedicated to game launchers and storefronts.”
Skeet? Really? Lil Jon’s “Get Low” came out 22 years ago.
Now if they had said “Skibidi” that would be a different story.
Yes, post-offence conduct is commonly used as circumstantial evidence in trial. Regarding the hush money case, I think a big goal for Trump’s team is to delay the sentencing until after the election.
Effectively yes. The SCOTUS has been hard at work over the past few months dismantling government checks and balances. They’ve ruled that politicians can throw out rulings from experts, take bribes without consequence, and attempt to overthrow the results of an election.
Lots of people in this thread are asking why this would pertain to the case since it was only official acts that were covered in the Supreme Court ruling.
Although the Manhattan case does not center on Mr. Trump’s presidency or official acts — but rather personal activity during his campaign — his lawyers argued on Monday that prosecutors had built their case partly on evidence from his time in the White House. And under the Supreme Court’s new ruling, prosecutors not only cannot charge a president for any official acts, but also cannot cite evidence involving official acts to bolster other accusations.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻) ANARCHY (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻)
For those who forgot polls don’t mean shit and only voting matters:
His heart got smaller too
I think it depends on the circumstances. I work for a publisher and submitted a request for one of my clients copyrighted books to be removed from the archive, and they took it down the same day.
No we should just replace all helpful answers with “drink glue”
The fucksmith post in question has been removed by moderators, so I wonder if Google really is pressuring Reddit to remove jokes from their platform now. This person had no idea their shit post would be used to train AI over a decade later, and they certainly weren’t violating any policies when they posted it. It’s like nobody involved in this process knew anything about Reddit.
Pay $60 million to train on bad data.
Implement AI trained on bad data.
Panic when the AI returns bad answers.
Manually remove bad data.
Profit??
Edit: it was removed when I checked yesterday, but it looks like they restored it.
Even if he wins the EC, he’ll still question the popular vote results.
A stiff breeze could probably take out a supermajority of the house and senate.
Reviewers are saying it is not able to do this, along with several other promised features.
Because her mentality is that animals’ lives have no value beyond the utility they bring to humans. It’s a surprisingly common one.
Do you want to be vegan?
The article is about faked images, so it makes sense they’d make the thumbnail image appear fake at a glance.
Awesome. I can’t wait to hear you explain why Bernie syphoning away Dem votes and handing Trump a second term would have been great for our country.