andyburke

Thank you for posting this so I didn’t have to.

Just a gem of a movie.

Fuck anyone who allies with this guy.

Have you … have you never stayed up past midnight? 👀

Everyone changes days at the same time. That’s the point.

You would get used to the switchover being in the middle of your working/waking day.

This wouldn’t be a big deal and if it were the status quo I bet someone, if not you, would be saying how dumb having everyone on different days would be in the mirror universe version of this thread.

It would be something to discuss with the Faircamp devs. If Faircamp seems like what you want except you would just plug in images instead of music, then maybe it would be worth pursuing.

If Faircamp doesn’t quite seem like what you want, it’s not.

For no time zones? 🙋‍♂️

Faircamp is great for this for music - I wonder if it could be pretty easily adapted for art, too.

Yeah, I get it.

But what I am saying is: if we just enforced the existing rules we wouldn’t need to be talking about banning whole classes of people, right?

There is nothing about the situation you described that is exclusively caused by children.

Ok, but we are in a thread about child-free places. 🤷‍♂️

Sorry, some assholes flaunted the rules, your group asked them to stop and when they did not, someone from your group left?

That isn’t a problem that has to do with children. It could have as easily been a radio.

<coughs out a bunch of diesel emissions> “hear hear!”

My guess? Using the term “addiction.”

https://fuelarc.com/tech/can-teslas-self-driving-software-detect-bus-only-lanes-not-reliably-no/

edit: it’s trivial to find examples of these utterly failing at basic driving. This isn’t close to human performance and it is obvious.

Get the data. Get it without putting me and my family at risk.

This is the same anecdotal appeal we get over and over while AI cars drive into firetrucks and trees in ways even the most basic licensed driver would not. Then we are told these are safer because people text or become distracted. I am over this garbage. Get real numbers and find a way to do it that doesn’t put me and my family at risk.

Evidence, please.

I have literally been in thousands of driving incidences where a human has not randomly driven into a tree.

You are making a claim here: that these AI systems are safer than humans. There is at least one clear counter example to your claim in existence (which I cited - https://youtu.be/frGoalySCns if anyone wants to try to figure out what this AI was doing) and there are others including ones where they have driven into the sides of tractor trailers. I assume you will make an argument about aggregates, but the sample size we have for these AI driving systems relative to the sample size we have for humans is many orders of magnitude different. And having now seen years of these incidents continuing to pile up, I believe there needs to be much more rigorous research and testing before you can make valid claims these systems are somehow safer.

A Tesla in FSD randomly just veered off the road into a tree. There is video. It makes no sense, very difficult to work out why the AI thought that looked like a good move.

These tools this author is saying we have do not work how people claim they do.

We are heading back to the BBS model and as an old man now I am fuckin here for it. 🤝

You continue to spout things with no citations and a bad vibe. I am done here.

That prompt modification “directed Grok to provide a specific response on a political topic” and “violated xAI’s internal policies and core values,” xAI wrote on social media.

Relevant quote because one of us didn’t read the article for sure.

Edit: not to mention that believing a system prompt somehow binds or constrains rather than influences these systems would also indicate to me that one of us definitely doesn’t understand how these work, either.