When you write code for a “runtime” that wasn’t intended to run your code.

That definition would be too broad, as includes any type of exploit.

In ROP, you modify the stack to write return addresses and then return to jump to the first of these addresses, the return addresses go to parts of the executable that end with a return instruction (gadgets), so it will always return to the next of your return address.

(That video is maybe not the easiest introduction to ROP.)

Having ROP in here as normal programming paradigm, as opposed to vibe coding, made the meme so much better.

Awesome!

Relevant xkcd: https://xkcd.com/2597/

Either that or incest porn.

Then we’ll ship you and your sister.

I’m not your brother, daddy!

It has spanish to english though, at least on my machine.

Yes.

But you could also leave a link to the original source. :-)

Sorry for the Google Translate Link. An easy alternative is much appreciated.

Firefox can translate websites locally now.

Might depend on your file browser.

You may also want to try, for example, the files “a1”, “a2”, “a3”, and “a10”. Lexicographically, “a2”>“a10”, but my file browser displays “a10” after “a2”.

Think the other way around: What’s the use case for case insensitive file names? Does it justify the effort and complexity for the filesystem and the programs to know the difference between lower and upper space chars?

I have not.

It seems you’re right. I wasn’t aware that it has a definition. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Userfriendliness As a result, I was so naive to just use it as being friendly to users. I’m kinda surprised that this seems to be a well established term (as can be seen by so many here interpreting it with this definition).

Will re-word post.

I also use arch, btw, so yes I’m probably biased in a similar way as you.

Most FOSS software I downloaded is very friendly to me, thanks. Or do you have a particular unfriendly FOSS software in mind?

Btw, out of interest, if the software you use is so unfriendly to you, why do you use it? Money reasons?

Proprietary shit is always easier to work with, if you’re just wanting the most basic thing that software does.

Do you have examples?

My image viewer shows images, my pdf viewer shows pdfs, my file browser shows files, my music player plays music files, and so on. All of them can do a little more, but the basic functionality is just there usually.

Possible. For me, the things I see from windows (disclaimer: I haven’t used any dos since years, but I’ve occasionally seen video material (including, for example, menus with ads, and horribly confusing settings)) are obtuse, and FOSS stuff is normal. But I may be biased in the a different direction than you.

There seems to be some confusion. With user friendliness I wasn’t referring to the UI. See Edit in updated post.

As said, EBU, not EU. Israel is member of EBU, Canada is not. And joining EU makes no difference.

Eurovision is organized by the european broadcasting union, not the european union.

Upgrading on arch involves looking at the arch news. And IIRC, there was also a warning for some time when upgrading grub. So, assuming people who use arch, btw, use it properly, I don’t see the issue.