Thank you for sharing! I have added your link to the body of my post.

Thank you! I have added your link to the body of my post.

Are you looking for something for everyday wear, or something more rugged/functional?

Ima guess it’s my references sections ^[1].

TikTok To Be Sold To Trump’s Right Wing Billionaire Buddies And Converted Into A Propaganda Mill ^[1.1]

The title feels misinformative to me given, the following from the article:

[…] Trump insiders claim to be zeroing in on a deal that would sell 80% of TikTok’s U.S. assets to […] ^[1.2]

To me, the title infers that TikTok is being sold with certainty, whereas the content of the article sates that a deal has yet to even be reached.

This is ironically an inevitable consequence of Wikipedia’s centralization undermining its strategic objective of making knowledge free and accessible to all. […]

Perhaps you’d be interested ^[1] in Ibis ^[2]?

Do you mind referencing some of the exceptions that you have in mind to the aforementioned rule?

I just try to keep the mnemonic “I before E except after C” ^[1] in my brain.

recieve vs. receive

Are you okay with a self-hosted solution? If so, you could, for example, self-host FreshRSS ^[1], and then use it to scrape a feed using XPath ^[2]. I can elaborate further on the method if you are interested.

[…] read how to read a book […]

Thank you for the recommendation 😊

I look at any individual’s history when they post anything sketchy and contextualize. […]

I am concerned that this would distill down to argumentum ad hominem.

[misinformation] is hardly an issue on this platform […]

In my opinion, that statement of yours is, ironically, responsible for why there may be an issue with misinformation. You state it with certainty, yet you provide no source to back up your claim. It is my belief that this sort of conjecture is at the source of misinformation issues.

What concrete steps can be taken to combat misinformation on social media? […]

Regarding my own content: I do my best to cite any claim that I make, no matter how trivial. If I make a statement for which I lack confidence in its veracity, I do my best to convey that uncertainty. I do my best to convey explicitly whether a statement is a joke, or sarcasm.

Fundamentally, my approach to this issue is based on this quote:

Rationality is not a character trait, it’s a process. If you fool yourself into believing that you’re rational by default, you open yourself up to the most irrational thinking. ^[1]

Regarding the content of others: If I come across something that I believe to be false, I try to politely respond to it with a sufficiently and honestly cited statement explaining why I think it is false. If I come across something of unknown veracity/clarity, I try to politely challenge the individual responsible to clarify their intent/meaning.

For clarity, I have no evidence to support that what I’m doing is an effective means to this end, but I want to believe that it’s helping in at least some small way.

What concrete steps can be taken to combat misinformation on social media?

Thanks! 😊

Nope! I do it all manually; though, it can definitely be tedious at times. It has crossed my mind to write a script to automatically generate at least some of them (or even just some of their components), but I just haven’t gotten around to it yet.

Also, as a side note, the citation style is my own that I’ve been “developing”. I’m sort developing it as I use it.

I’m not sure if this exactly fits what you’re looking for, but the following 5 albums by The Dear Hunter are connected through a shared storyline ^[1]:

1. Act I: The Lake South, The River North ^[2]
2. Act II: The Meaning of, and All Things Regarding Ms. Leading ^[3]
3. Act III: Life and Death ^[4]
4. Act IV: Rebirth in Reprise ^[5]
5. Act V: Hymns with the Devil in Confessional ^[6]

Is this post intended to be a sort of outcry around the idea that there’s a risk of malware being in the AUR?

[…] Classical centrist arguments […]

How are you defining centrism?

[…] Its always do you have a source, can you explain, etc, never adding to the discussion. […]

Do you not think adding sources and context is adding to the discussion?