AnonTwo

So…did they investigate uvalde yet or no?

Pretty sure they’re trying to make “we need more control over the internet” into a national security issue, similar to during the cold war. So basically tie him in with a party people in the US really dislike.

Should’ve gotten Cotton Hill. He’d be an asshole but at least he’d get the nationality right.

Pretty sure Cali wants nothing to do with Texas

I feel like every time someone says this, a federal employee should be allowed to audit the schools that person went to on how the fuck they messed up so badly teaching this failure.

Didn’t the animal tests lead to pretty bad deaths? And wasn’t that less than a year ago? I can’t imagine this going well.

Plus there was the blind-tech that was revealed not too long ago where now that they’re bankrupt the group is slowly going blind and worse. I feel like none of this is going to end well.

So really you’re only playing moderator because you’re for it, and don’t want people to vote against it.

I mean,

If it stops the war let him do it for the wrong reasons.

I don’t think this will actually stop it, but i’m just saying.

I mean, VR is a thing still. It’s just still niche at the moment. I don’t think it has to be the main way to enjoy entertainment.

That said, I’m pretty sure the glasses you want are AR, not VR (Augmented reality)

It’d be nice to trace an artwork back to it’s source. But I don’t think this is actually practical.

I mean, I’ve thought it was obvious from the beginning he wants to be president so he can pardon himself. Like that has always been the end goal.

You’re literally just ignoring the people who tell you he’s been charged with a crime. You posted a similar message in another thread yesterday, and just like this one you’re just posting and leaving.

Think of it this way

By the next election one choice isn’t eligible anymore, and the second will likely be so buried under court cases he won’t be able to.

So it’s more of a “finish what was started” and hopefully by the next election we’ll finally have some new people to worry about.

Literally violated some of the biggest laws in the country. So blatantly that literally everyone saw it.

“For nothing”

…Yes, cause that means the base he is working with to get elected is one he thinks wants to hear this.

If this is what you have to say in N.C. to get elected, I’m really worried about N.C.

I hate to say this man, but assassination is a bigger deal than a murder, cause it does mean someone in a position of power wanted you dead.

All life is sacred, but that doesn’t mean the amount of effort taken to snuff it out is equal. Does it make you feel better if you view it from the effort taken and not from the life lost?

To take the impact out of assassination though would just be…bad though? It’d be like saying you should react the same from crime as you do from organized crime. One of them takes considerably more effort both to do and to deal with.

…?

If anything an assassination is worse than just being murdered

A democracy cannot work if the will of the people is not enforced. part of that is enforcing the laws that those people have put in place. To argue that someone can be voted in against that is, indeed, undemocratic.

You’re looking at the end result and ignoring the process that leads up to it. Given that the main violation was constitutional, the amount of effort needed just to make that into law requires a significant amount of representatives or straight up popularity throughout the country. This is not something that should be lightly brushed aside.

So yes, if they’re not eligible, they’re not eligible. Because by supporting your stance it is also damning the stance of many others both past and present.

I would also argue you shouldn’t find much issue with finding someone you can vote for that hasn’t performed the very uncommon crime of treason.

They are not. Quite strictly speaking, the Russian example you gave is an abuse of authority.

You are comparing a silencing of political opponents to someone who has performed the most basic form of treason. Like, there are no countries where Trumps situation would not be worse for what he has been recorded doing.

You are blatantly trying to tie together things to support someone who is cut and dry a traitor to the people of the country, not just it’s government, and has already been noted on many accounts that he will disrupt the democracy in the country if elected.

If you want to keep dying on this hill, I’ll probably just block you because this is a waste of time. Because you’re not here to have a discussion, you’re here to find people who don’t understand these basic concepts that you can potentially sway to your side. In other words you’re a waste of time to argue with, you decided from the outgo what your stance was.