The illegal payoff and his money ganes began outside his presidency. They are state convictions.
SCOTUS did not invalidate those.
I dunno where you’re going with your aggrieved post-truth rhetoric, but the truth did and does matter.
The illegal payoff and his money ganes began outside his presidency. They are state convictions.
SCOTUS did not invalidate those.
I dunno where you’re going with your aggrieved post-truth rhetoric, but the truth did and does matter.
The Stormy Brown pay off was during the campaign, tho.
Which justices do you think get gone?
I don’t think it’s the corrupt ones. He can do whatever, he can pardon. And now when he says do “x” it Is a Constitutional order.
Even if it’s not.
They want to hurt us. It’s the common denominator for many.
The other stuff is noise. Porn stars, confidential papers, fraud, none of that matters. Because it doesn’t matter.
It’s the backlash. We weather it or we don’t.
Something will. The DNC may become illegal. Or something.
Remember, being a liberal, according to the plan, is un-American.
Hard to say. He didn’t look like a great candidate until he was Prez.
I’m not saying let’s throw caution to the wind or let’s make a huge mess.
Only that it can has happened and worked. It does not mean it will ever again.
Lincoln was the third choice.
No worries. Have absolutely done the same in the past.
And I’ll take the moment to salute your reliance on fact and citation. Wish more people did the same.
Cheers
I’m not the one being slow. SCOTUS had 8 people while McConnell held up Garland.
Officially SCOTUS was and is nine people. But if the wheels of government turn slow enough, SCOTUS continues to do its job with whoever has made it through the process.
Officially 9, it functioned with 8. No one is credibly saying all those decisions must be thrown out or that SCOTUS cannot function during a shortage.
If that shortage was 4, people would be vocal. But legally, it would still be functional.
I not talking about changing the official number. I never did in this thread until you did.
It ran at 8 for quite a while. No one’s legitimately saying those decisions don’t count.
The official number can be whatever. Congress doesn’t get to nominate. And SCOTUS would keep deciding.
If there were 5 justices, they’d still be functional. As proven in the past, there’s no requirement for 9.
Esit: I’d - > If
Threat of impeachment. Dems will vote for impeachment. Republicans will, too, if the president is a Democrat.
deleted by creator
We* should be free to own as many guns as we want.
*You know.
He has to be part of an opinion in order for this to work. That opinion stands the test of time best if he can put forth a legal opinion that supports his preferred answer.
“Congress shall”… I wonder if that’s part of his thinking.
legally carry a gun
Watch states try to find ways to allow him within their borders.
Republicans honor sacrifice by making sure it’s big. They’ll send you to war and complain about VA costs.
We’ll have to find out. Legally, he gets equal treatment.
It’s his first felony conviction but there are 34 of them.