• TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m arguing that the principal of debate requires that you have a mind that can be changed. I’m not actually suggesting that one does, necessarily, change their mind over the course of a debate. However, it can be incredibly convincing to show a shift in thinking (taking the audience with you) where you do cede some caveats, but use them to further your argument and make it more convincing.

    I listen to intelligence squared, and I wish that debates were formally moderated and scored.

    • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m arguing that the principal of debate requires that you have a mind that can be changed.

      Having an open mind that can be changed if provided with sufficient evidence is fantastic, something we should all strive for.

      That being said, I don’t think it is necessarily needed for a debate. If you’re in a formally structured debate I would hope that you have fully considered all aspects, the pros and the cons. During the debate they should be making their points and critiquing the opposing viewpoint. Changing their mind would, in my opinion, be a disservice to the audience.