• Adobe has announced pricing changes to its Creative Cloud subscriptions that will take effect from the middle of next month.
  • It cited “continued innovation” as a reason to overhaul the pricing for its creative software suite.
  • The changes only affect users in the US, Canada, and Mexico for now.
  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It won’t stop until creatives stop paying.

    There are alternative tools available, but the number of people I have seen not want to learn a new UI is high. Adobe knows this, so they continue to raise prices.

    • WarlordSdocy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I mean it’s not just not wanting to learn a new UI. It’s that a company uses Adobe as it’s standard so if you don’t have experience with it they won’t hire you. And if you try to come in using a different tool they’re just gonna end up forcing you to use Adobe.

      • AkashicOwl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        How many users are actually working in a company that uses Adobe? Aren’t most users just casual, or even if they make money of art, working solo? (So, no need to conforme to an industry standard)

        I might be totally wrong tho

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Is it the case that most creatives cancel their subs when they get that job? Does the job have a site license (assuming Adobe even allows site licenses)?

        • pup_atlas@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Yes, creative jobs near universally provide licenses to creative cloud. Aside from companies not hiring people without that experience, the amount of saved assets and templates, along with the deep integration between apps makes the prospect of a full “migration” a ridiculously expensive prospect.

          The value in these assets is not just in video files or pictures you can easily migrate to another app. It’s the complex scripts and templates that allow creatives to make custom branded content on the fly. Like a lower third that adjusts styling depending on the name you put in, and auto resizes to fit the text, etc.

          • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            56 minutes ago

            Is it just me, or does that sound like a monopoly?

            Do any creatives attempt to create assets for another platform?

            I’m really not blaming creatives on this one. Obviously they need to make money. But this seems like a clear case of advantage being taken against one skillset by virtue of monopoly.

            I’d say it seems like the key issue affecting creatives, if AI didn’t exist.

            As an outsider: how did we get to a point where every creator is limited to one box?