• Servais (il/le)@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s not so much about classification than finding a place to identify it using a suite of yes/no branches based on specific graphems.

    German and Dutch are very close languages, but in complete different places in this tree.

    • JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      30 days ago

      German and Dutch are very close languages, but in complete different places in this tree.

      So maybe we could use a better platform for understanding? (hence my original point?)

      (Modern German and Dutch are both from the West-Germanic tree, last I checked)

      specific graphems

      Okay, fine, granted-- but how does that actually help anyone in this day & age learn about these languages?

      AS IN– dude, we don’t need to carry a master’s degree in order to understand how English formed out of Anglo-Saxon, with Norman French overlaid on top, now do we?

      EDIT: Oh rabbits, no, it’s ME whose wrong. Whups…

      • Eiim@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I still don’t think you understand the point of the graphic. It’s called “What European language am I reading?”, not “how are these European languages related?”

        • JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          30 days ago

          Oof. I think you’re right (2wks later, dangit!), Eiim.
          Sorry about that. :S

          @Servais@discuss.tchncs.de @discuss.tchncs.de, that was rude of me, and I apologise.

          FWIW, I’ve posted a general apology in our sub’s general update if you care to look. Sorry again.

          @Comment105@lemm.ee,

          I’d personally attack you with something far worse than a silly goose. If I was on my reddit account!

          Hmm, what do you think about rabbits instead of geese…?