The electric car manufacturer Tesla had to issue a massive recall this month to fix faulty hood latches that can open while its cars are driving. The problem affects more than 1.8 million cars, which means it’s slightly smaller than the recall in December that applied to more than 2 million Teslas.

The problem, according to the official National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s Part 573 safety recall report, affects model year 2021–2024 Model 3s (built between September 21, 2020, and June 2, 2024), model year 2021–2024 Model Ss (built between January 26, 2021, and July 15, 2024), model year 2021–2024 Model Xs (built between August 18, 2021, and July 15, 2024), and model year 2020–2024 Model Ys (built between January 9, 2020, and July 15, 2024).

The problem first became apparent to Tesla in March of this year after complaints about unintended hood opening from Chinese customers. By April, it had identified the problem as deformation of the hood latch switch, “which could prevent the customer from being notified about an open hood state.”

Although the problem is with the hood latch, as with many Tesla safety recalls, the problem can be fixed with an over-the-air software patch. The new software is able to detect if the hood is open and, if so, will display a warning to the driver to alert them to stop their vehicle and secure the hood.

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    What difference does it make if the problem is solved…? Asking customers to bring their cars in and have a latch replaced unnecessarily is super inconvenient.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I would say more annoying is to getting those alerts more and more frequently. According to the article this is a software “fix” for the lock banding and stopping functioning.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        According to the article this is a software “fix”

        Exactly. “Fix” being the keyword here. If you have evidence otherwise, please feel free to share with the class.

        Personally, I don’t like having to take my car into the shop for no reason, so I don’t appreciate the suggestion.

    • SoJB@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      It literally states the program is due to a deformation of the switch, a physical issue.

      I’m sure there are ways to safely engineer around it. I don’t trust any American manufacturer to do so. What guarantee do we have that it won’t continue deforming further after the fix? What happens to the patched sensor software if it does occur?

      Do you unironically trust Musk enough to not open your vehicles hood at 80mph?

      Really not sure why so many people on this post are having trouble understanding that concept. Maybe they want to justify their $80k paperweight lmao.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It literally states the program is due to a deformation of the switch, a physical issue.

        It also literally states that the software update will fix it. You can literally fix hardware issues with software. Could be as simple as recalibrating the switch, I don’t know.

        What guarantee do we have that it won’t continue deforming further after the fix?

        What guarantee do you have that replacement hardware would permanently solve the problems? There simply are no guarantees.

        Do you unironically trust Musk enough to not open your vehicles hood at 80mph?

        I don’t drive 80MPH. Regardless Musk is the CEO, not an engineer, and is not as involved in day to day operations as you think he is.

        Maybe they want to justify their $80k paperweight lmao.

        Mine cost ~$30k so I can’t speak to those folks.

        • OutsizedWalrus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sometimes you can.

          It’s common to use a Hall effect sensor for positioning. It gives off an analog value. You might be able adjust the signal threshold that you consider to be “open” or “closed” in software.

          Further, this is probably something that you just don’t spend a bunch of time engineering. Pick a value that’s well with your tolerance range and move onto harder problems. When a problem comes up, you can fine turn the range.