• XiozTzu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    So you would rather submit your non-anonymized data? Because those bastards will find a way to unanonimize it. Is Apple doing the right thing or not?

    • NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      What? No. I would rather use my own local LLM where the data never leaves my device. And if I had to submit anything to ChatGPT I would want it anonymized as much as possible.

      Is Apple doing the right thing? Hard to say, any answer here will just be an opinion. There are pros and cons to this decision and that’s up to the end user to decide if the benefits of using ChatGPT are worth the cost of their data. I can see some useful use cases for this tech, and I don’t blame Apple for wanting to strike while the iron is hot.

      There’s not much you can really do to strip out identifying data from prompts/requests made to ChatGPT. Any anonymization of that part of the data is on OpenAI to handle.
      Apple can obfuscate which user is asking for what as well as specific location data, but if I’m using the LLM and I tell it to write up a report while including my full name in my prompt/request… that’s all going directly into OpenAIs servers and logs which they can eventually use to help refine/retrain their model at some point.

        • farcaller@fstab.sh
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 months ago

          IIRC they demonstrated an interaction with Siri where it asks the user for consent before enriching the data through chatgpt. So yeah, that seems to mean your data is sent out (if you consent).

        • NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’d say the proof is on Apple to show that it’s being done on-device or that all processing is done on iCloud servers.

          You’re saying that OpenAI is just going to hand over their full ChatGPT model for Apple to set up on their own servers for free?

          But from the article itself:

          the partnership could burn extra money for OpenAI, because it pays Microsoft to host ChatGPT’s capabilities on its Azure cloud

          I get it if they created a small version of their LLM to run locally, but I would expect Apple to pay a price even for that.

          I think you may be confusing this ChatGPT integration with Apple’s own LLM that they’re working on… Again, from the linked article:

          Still, Apple’s choice of ChatGPT as Apple’s first external AI integration has led to widespread misunderstanding, especially since Apple buried the lede about its own in-house LLM technology that powers its new “Apple Intelligence” platform.