Thank god she wasn’t juicing the weasel
Or … wheezin the juice
Thank god she wasn’t juicing the weasel
Or … wheezin the juice
If the license of the project isn’t being respected then this is a problem.
Does the title not say his name and does the article not have his picture?
What are you saying here?
The “John” is Matt Gaetz. He paid for sex. He allegedly (and very likely did) groomed and raped minors. He is named.
Idk if the statement “The Chinese built a thing in a short period of time” means why you think it means in 2024 but congratulations on missing every mark possible with your comment.
Do you have proof they’re sending it to OpenAI?
I believe I heard it’s done on device or on iCloud servers then deleted.
I mean, that’s the claim at least
I know what a shart is, but it doesn’t change anything.
Did you really just censor enshittification?
It’s still got a lot of good science left, with a decade of orbit to figure out how to get back to it for maintenance we could keep it running.
That doesn’t improve things.
And by production car on the road I mean “by a car that is in production and allowed to drive on the road” though I admit it was vague and easy to take literally in that regard.
That’s not something that should happen to a car that is on the road.
The difference between an artist and an entertainer
deleted by creator
We all should do as Jesus says here.
verbose … not needed?
If the words don’t happen how can I trust computer magic?
Sounds like an error message from a valid tar command
tar -czvf tar_name.tar.gz ./
Did he first have to travel back in time to a time when this was hard because that would break a man.
This kinda sounds like the many decades old argument for security domains and trusted paths
Just, not quite as well made and not nearly as well informed.
20 years ago this was a cromulent argument. Today it’s just narrow
Thanks
buuuUHdy