• Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, I’d be okay with that but this bill doesn’t even ban TikTok. It forces ByteDance to sell TikTok or face being banned. Our leadership is fine with out data being endlessly harvested by megacorps, but they don’t want China to run one of the megacorps doing it.

      It’s kind of funny really, because even if China/ByteDance sells TikTok they could just switch from harvesting personal data directly with TikTok to buying all the data harvested from TikTok and other platforms just like the USA already does.

    • Daxtron2@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Instead of banning specific apps, ban the harvest and sale of personal data itself. Then the apps people want to use are still given a chance to exist if they stop mining data.

        • Daxtron2@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          No, you said we should ban apps, I said we should have better privacy laws. Two totally different things.

          • HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yes but it’s splitting hairs… If you ban alcoholic drinks it’s basically the same as banning putting alcohol in drinks. Especially for a conversation between laymen on Lemmy

            • Daxtron2@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              It’s more like we should ban the addition of unsafe additives to alcohol vs banning a specific brand of alcohol, even though most brands add it.