Cannon seemed to invite Trump to raise the argument again at trial, where Jack Smith canā€™t appeal, expert says

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon on Thursday rejected one of former President Donald Trumpā€™s motions to dismiss his classified documents case.

Cannon shot down Trumpā€™s motion arguing that the Espionage Act is unconstitutionally vague when applied to a former president.

Cannon after a daylong hearingĀ issued an orderĀ saying some of Trumpā€™s arguments warrant ā€œserious considerationā€ but wrote that no judge has ever found the statute unconstitutional. Cannon said that ā€œrather than prematurely decide now,ā€ she denied the motion so it could be ā€œraised as appropriate in connection with jury-instruction briefing and/or other appropriate motions.ā€

ā€¦

ā€œThe Judgeā€™s ruling was virtually incomprehensible, even to those of us who speak ā€˜legalā€™ as our native language,ā€ former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance wrote onĀ Substack, calling part of her ruling ā€œdeliberately dumb.ā€

ā€œThe good news here is temporary,ā€ Vance wrote. ā€œItā€™s what Iā€™d call an ugly win for the government. The Judge dismissed the vagueness argumentā€”but just for today. She did it ā€˜without prejudice,ā€™ which means that Trumpā€™s lawyers could raise the argument again later in the case. In fact, the Judge seemed to do just that in her order, essentially inviting the defense to raise the argument again at trial.ā€

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    Ā·
    10 months ago

    Its not ā€œClinton didnt come to my state and make me feel specialā€

    its

    ā€œClinton didnt go to these states, to engage with her base and share with them her vision, plans, goals, etc, Which allowed just enough to be swayed by those that didā€

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      10 months ago

      To be fair, thatā€™s mostly what her campaign manager was supposed to work out.

      Mooooooook

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      10 months ago

      If this was 1840 Iā€™d be more convinced. We have the internet. Weā€™ve had radio for a hundred years. You shouldnā€™t need to go to a rally to know what a major politicanā€™s visions, plans, goals, etc, are.

      ā€œI felt ignoredā€ is a stupid emotional response, but I can understand it, kind of. Sometimes Iā€™m petty, too. Feeling so ignored that you vote for trump is inexcusable, though. I donā€™t think Iā€™d excuse shirking your civic duty here, either.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        Ā·
        9 months ago

        You are sure hung up on this whole ā€œI was ignoredā€ thing.

        Are you, specifically, upset that cause you felt ignored?

        • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          Ā·
          9 months ago

          Thatā€™s what I took from the ā€œshe didnā€™t come to my state and share her vision with me, specificallyā€ thing. Or the related "I donā€™t like being called flyover country ", I guess. Maybe I just donā€™t get the people in question.

          I live in a major city and donā€™t feel politically ignored. A little, what do you call it, victim of a tyranny of a minority, sometimes, what with like North and South Dakota having senators.