12·
20 days agoSure buddy.
- 0 Posts
- 52 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
Cake day: July 26th, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
You should have said “sure buddy” and ignored them.
He is being charged with W R O N G T H I N K.
I mean for the big software boys to actually start caring about it.
This feels like a scam just like those Elon Musk crypto scams you see everywhere.
It’s pretty sad how not having the money for it makes it unbearable, while all of them don’t need to experience it, disconnecting them from their practices.
They also take a cut from content purchases and tips to content creators.
You don’t know what daddy and Billy did in the panel before.
llama3.1 (8B) by Facebook:
>>> what does the I in LLM stand for?In the context of natural language processing (NLP) and artificial intelligence, "LLM" typically stands for **L**arge **L**anguage **M**odel. A Large Language Model is a type of machine learning model that has been trained on large datasets to understand and generate human-like language. These models are often used in applications such as text classification, sentiment analysis, question answering, and even chatbots like myself! I'm glad you asked!>>> but the I !!!!In the specific case of an LLM being a Large **L**anguage **M**odel, the "LL" part doesn't explicitly mention the letter "I". However, in the context of AI and ML models, there are other types of models that do involve the letter "I", such as: * ILM: Image Language Model (combining computer vision with natural language processing) * IMLM: Interpretable Machine Learning Model * MLM: Masked Language Model (a specific type of LLM) And then there's also... * DALL-E, but that's a different story! But in the case of the original LLM, it typically stands for Large **L**anguage **M**odel.
The article implies nobody even knew it already had this functionality. I’m sure the customers weren’t told either.
They kept trying to ruin my experience so I’ve switched to Invidious and Odysee.
Invidious only for the content creators that don’t crosspost to Odysee yet.
Every video ad needs to have the video uploaded to YouTube afaik. So it’s possible to find it, although I’m not sure if it also works for private videos.
Looking at the IP logs of the users on a website of mine shows that many people are already using IPv6 alongside IPv4. Some ISPs even don’t use IPv4 anymore unless you pay extra (Germany/Austria)
I just moved to Linux and started fresh.
The big mental change was instead of searching “sony vegas on linux please” I just started searching for “video editing software Linux”, and take any possible limitations and live with them, as I know it’s only temporary until Linux catches on.
App Stores are responsible for their content. If google simply vets the app store developers and their team and their product, they should have some kind of trust that whatever that app store supplies will be up to standards. But on the other hand, it’s actually none of their business to hold my hand for me when I want to do stuff with my device.
It’s more about getting the less tech-savy people away from the Play Store. It creates a road that app makers can take to remove the need of Google Services, eventually making gapps fully optional for all.
The last problem you raise seems more like a symptom of a problem than an actual problem. This kind of weird behavior is only possible because Google simply does not care about others. A simple “this app is managed by x” configuration setting would be easy enough to implement in Android.
2·30 days agoDon’t forget stupid DRM bullshit.
https://www.w3.org/TR/2024/WD-encrypted-media-2-20240718/
Editors: Joey Parrish (Google Inc.) Greg Freedman (Netflix Inc.) Former editors: Mark Watson (Netflix Inc.) (Until September 2019) David Dorwin (Google Inc.) (Until September 2017) Jerry Smith (Microsoft Corporation) (Until September 2017) Adrian Bateman (Microsoft Corporation) (Until May 2014)
The title should be “Google pulls plug out of Chromium”
Too bad that even when people start switching, people writing drafts for the W3 spec are mostly Google employees. I’m sure that’ll be their next battleground.
Can you explain in technical detail why? Because I don’t see this really being much of an issue.
- Alternative stores in the App stores would still need to go trough Google’s process of being accepted. Notices can be added to their download pages and these stores can even be forced to undergo a stricter process to make sure they are legit.
- Downloading using a different front end changes absolutely nothing in terms of malware and junk.
I really dislike that guy. I was interested in his website but lost interest because of him. I already forgot why I started disliking him. But this just adds to that.