Some of those that work forces
Are the same that burn crosses
Some of those that work forces
Are the same that burn crosses
You are not the vast majority of people. People want killer economy, no unemployment, no inflation (I know these are all incompatible). They don’t want meh.
The second you say not great, but not bad, it’s over.
The threshold is wanting great, so much the maga asshole made it his slogan. Nobody (collectively) wants “okay”
Store might refuse large bills on small purchases. Doubt they’d put up a fit if you used a $100 to buy $120 worth of stuff.
Let’s say you can get the 2/3 of Congress. Are you really going to get 3/4 of the states legislatures?
But there are checks against their rulings.
Most of their decisions are around laws that can be rewritten to correct whatever negative outcome was seen in the court. This meets your simple majority and presidential signature standard.
For claims of constitutionality there is still a check via amending the constitution… Which is not far from your proposal of 2/3 of Congress. You just also have to clear 3/4 of the states.
I think the problem is the idiots that are supposed to be the check are fully supporting what the courts are doing–and the idiots don’t actually represent the interests or will of the people.
But the brands value is in the personality. Killing info wars only creates an opportunity for him to create Schminfo Schwarz with little hiccup. Buying sets and whatnot with business partners is trivial. People make podcasts in their closets at home.
Congress would impeach her and the Senate would remove her. Therein lies the joke.
It doesn’t count. You need to wage war or aid/comfort the states enemies.
If they can prove he did something with the documents, eg sold Intel to Iran, for example, there’s likely a case. Saudi it gets complicated since the US doesn’t call them an enemy.
Either way, nothing in the case comes close to justifying a treason charge, though he clearly was acting against the best interests of the country.
I don’t think that’s fundamentally disqualifying. What’s the proposal on who could reasonably try this case? Are appointees by political opponents okay? Only appointees pre Clinton?
The bigger problem, regardless of who is on trial, is she was never supposed to be on the bench.
He is the cancer
Frankly it doesn’t matter. Japan has several private companies operating rail services. Tokyo has several subway systems.
We need more appropriately priced, accessible mass transit. I don’t care if it’s public or private.
Because nobody in any public transit board has ever implemented such a thing?
In North Carolina, park and ride busses for the state fair have long been a thing, among a litany of several other examples.
Maybe for public schools? I seriously doubt Barron is attending a school with more than a few dozen in his graduating class.
Edit: did a quick Google. 610 students at his school in grades 6-12… So something like 90 students per grade level.
Is there a summary here? I thought they had a reputable brand and must’ve missed when it turned to shit/why it turned to shit. Have seen several dragging them recently.
“part of the fabric” not “the fabric”
I’m an ally, but at the end of the day let’s not over conflate statements. It doesn’t serve anyone a favor.
Over stating gives poor intentioned people room and also means that supporters relent.
“The fabric” should never apply to any group tbh.
4000 alternating currents.
Recreational flying would be the doctor who owns a Cessna and is just taking it from point A to point A… There is no point B.
It should go something like forced sale, closing debts as those parties have nothing to do with it, balance to the state… Rinse and repeat until it adds up to enough.
Except the President has pardon power.
Soooo, henchmen also have absolute immunity if the president is fully aware that what he has ordered is illegal.