I’m just now reviewing ancient comments and replies of mine. If you haven’t found out already, think of a site that’s similar to Facebook, but instead of making “friends” as the big draw, it’s all about your neighborhood and surrounding neighborhoods. So it’s filled with people asking about where to find “cheap reliable (insert service here like landscaping, drywalling, etc)”, suspicious people seen around the place which another commenter mentioned, so given the very white, very Karen-like audience is probably just a notice that some racial minority person was here. Like I mentioned, lost pets are a common post, there was recent 2 different companies going around digging fiber lines for Internet service, and then the predictable “has anyone switched, how do you like it?” type posts that follow.

A lot of these people don’t know each other, so their only common ground seems, at least where I am, to be mostly just where they physically live, and the fact that they all love Trump.

deleted by creator

She is stuck on that side. If she knows some kind of news or information is not sanctioned by Fox News she automatically either avoids listening to it in the first place, or discounts it immediately. Even on just local news (and this is a very conservative area, at least this half of the state) if they say something about gay people, or just mention a gay event and if they don’t immediately say something negative about it, she just rolls her eyes.

Even with a TV show she likes, if gay characters do a gay thing (omg 2 dudes kissing!) she will literally make the noise… Umm what is the word for it… Retching, I think? Whatever the barf noise is called. She will literally make that noise and look away from the screen.

There is nothing rational about this kind of behavior, you can’t win this argument. The chess board is already on the floor here.

So I don’t know anything about that documentary, but if she has any reason to think it’s not sponsored by Fox News, it’s literally just fiction at best and “Communist Marxist propaganda” at worst.

Interesting. I use it all the time but I don’t have a separate app installed for it.

This is much more useful advice.

“whatever the amendment is”. You clearly don’t belong here discussing politics. Absolutely everyone is big on “whichever amendment that is”.

What kinda bait is this supposed to be?

I’m confused. There is no assistant app as far as I can tell. It seems to just be part of the OS.

I don’t see a Gemini app either though.

Too relatable.

I made an account to browse neighborhood news. If someone loses a cat or dog, I do want to be on the lookout. Haven’t added a single friend there. I’m just there to observe and potentially help save a pet. But it’s very “boomer” there, and in my experience (having lived here my whole life) every boomer is a Trump fan until proven otherwise. Every boomer goes to church every Sunday. They’re all the literal stereotype, and almost half are the same person as the ones you see interviewed at rallies by liberal-leaning journalists.

Well said. I love everything about this agreement and the limits it inherently puts on “creative” terms in their agreements.

Pirating only takes a digital copy, they still have the physical ones.

I can hear my mom yelling about it now. Funny how she was mostly ignorant about here existence until Fox News started complaining about her and now she hates her guts. Always liked watching the super bowl until this mess and now she’s “maybe I don’t bother”.

But if I poke her about it she turns into “I am not just parroting them. You need to stop reading CNN and all those brainwashed sources.”

It’s so close to realizing, but won’t cross the line. I have read about 2 articles from CNN in my entire life. The entire news industry hates maga now. It’s pretty much just FN, Newsmax, and the absolute far end of the spectrum of hate preachers and Alex Jones that say anything close to what you want to hear, as far as I can see.

Yeah if the entire world can agree on something, but my preferred group is the holdout, I think I would re-examine my view. It’s just mind boggling that just one huge mainstream network says stuff that all the others disagree with, and that’s the one you are just so sure it’s right about everything.

Someone is always going to be the worst in the nation.

Pretty sure publishing the actual names of everyone will have amazing to watch consequences.

I can’t see a good reason or even a good argument why any person should have their name hidden for any reason at all. Let them all face public scrutiny. Let’s see what kind of stories they come up with as excuses.

Publish the names, cowards. There is no good reason not to, change my mind.

He wouldn’t get 1% if it was just his name on it with no opposition.

Not really. He would actually have to have a universe out there in the multiverse where he does win for this to be a factor. He doesn’t win even a 1,000th of any single city (even if you counted country wide total as votes in one city) in this universe though.

Is that supposed to be a consequence people take seriously?

Tell me you want to lose an election without telling me. Clearly you’re only in it to make the number of people trump beat higher. Actively does not want to win.

I don’t see the downside to this in particular.

Wake me up when a state that matters (as in, a state that will have an impact on the likelihood of Trump getting to and winning the general election) does it.

I’m not convinced a red state would dare put their metaphorical balls on the chopping block like that.

I basically did back in like 2014. My accounts still existed, so I finally closed out the big 3 in October. I hadn’t used them in years, but they were still there

I got next door, but only care about it as far as looking out for potential missing pets. I live in a fairly red area, and everyone is middle-aged on there, and everything I saw was super conservative people, and some hate for anything mentioning the possibility of non straight people.