Thanks, glimpsed over that line too fast. So durability concerns are most likely the limiting factor, hence the trial run. If, say, the battery can’t keep up wih continuously getting topped up and fails after a short time, it’s impractical/expensive. But could be the other way around as well.
waka
- 0 Posts
- 6 Comments
Makes me wonder if this is cheaper than refitting a train line with overhead wiring and if not possible, power rails.
On e cigarettes specifically, after having watched bigclive dismantle lots of them, showing that they are practically just a few tiny cheap components away from being rechargeable and refillable (and they can indeed almost all be recharged and refilled), I guess manufacturers simply saw a market for it. It’s stupid from start to finish, but then again cigarettes as a whole are stupid.
Actually, some of them aren’t remotely placed correctly.
waka@feddit.deto Europe@feddit.de•Five and a half million Germans could not heat their homes sufficiently in 2022 due to lack of moneyEnglish9·2 years agoI wish I could do that. Unfortunately my rented flat requires 23°C of heating to prevent mold thanks to bad windows that cannot be fixed due to the house community not wanting to pay for replacing them. And yes I’m practicing proper venting, supported with several devices for timing. I’m so glad I’ll be moving out soon.
Well, trials are there for a reason. Battery-only-powered trains could be a good idea or a bad idea.
Remember the trial project for overhead wiring for trucks on the motorway? It ran for a couple of years, and the end result was that it wasn’t feasible, despite some interesting benefits. But if it weren’t for the trial, some people would still think it was feasible, while others would think it was unfeasible.
I’m leaning more on the unfeasible side with this train, but let’s just see what happens.