Why would we discuss changing the law, rather than ensuring that it is applied indiscriminately? ANY law and punishment can be used to discriminate, and many are. By your logic if the police started prosecuting murderers in a biased manner, we should remove the law against murder.

Seems like I’m being attacked for something I didn’t say. My statement was purely a very minor thing, about how the issue is enforcement, not the actual law. And I certainly did not imply anything with it, but it seems a lot is being read into those few words that were not at all intended

? The law has been around a century, current controversy is that it’s not being applied equally

What about my statement is brutal? It’s not the law at fault, the law is impartial about all religious symbols. The problem is the lack of equal enforcement. Which is essentially what you’re saying in different words

That’s a problem with enforcement, not the law.

It’s not a database. God, how many years is it going to take before people understand just what LLMs are and are not capable of?

That is what LLMs do in EVERY conversation. Most of the time you don’t notice it, because it fits your expectations.

No, because that requires it to understand the words. It doesn’t.

Have you met babies? They’ll eat anything, period. Except their food. That’s half the challenge in parenting.

I am a software developer. That is absolutely how development works in some places

Not sure why you think it was intentional. The error could have been around since the 1st iphone and they just discovered it due to current political tensions, for all we know.

Can we get the Israel flag to come up when we type ‘genocide’?

I doubt you’d get anything useful out of it. The idea is that it messes with your time perception, making you feel as if you’ve spent a huge amount of time in whatever emotional state you’re in. It’s not going to actually overclock your brain to run at a thousand times its normal speed.

What’s gab?

Yeah, China’s also behind all the postmasters who were knowingly charged with theft for software bugs. Damn them Chinese!

Edit: Shame on me for thinking this was sufficiently blatant sarcasm

Yeah, mostly because they’ve got no more births to reduce lol. Keep in mind these are the worst countries in Asia, though. There’s still plenty that have decent birth rates (for now)

Uh what. Source on that please?

Experts have generally agreed that any reduction in population size will come far too late to help with the current climate crisis. We’re either going to hit sustainability with our current population or die in the process.

Yeah it’s a bit of a hyperbole, but the rate is what’s important. By the time we hit worldwide negative growth rates (which is projected to happen this century), it’s going to be way too late to have a discussion about whether or not that’s a good thing.

“What’s unfortunately happened for these young people is that because of the toxicity of the debate, they’ve often been bypassed by local services who’ve been really nervous about seeing them,” Dr Cass said.

“So rather than doing the things that they would do for other young people with depression, or anxiety, or perhaps undiagnosed autistic spectrum disorder, they’ve tended to pass them straight on to the Gid service.”

“There are few other areas of healthcare where professionals are so afraid to openly discuss their views, where people are vilified on social media, and where name-calling echoes the worst bullying behaviour,” she said.

Her report added that the “exceptional” toxicity has had a negative impact on the quality and availability of evidence.

There’s nothing objectionable or controversial in this article, yet it’s getting downvoted to heck. Good object example of how legitimate discussion of the topic is being suppressed